W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Web Crypto API Survey Questions

From: David Dahl <ddahl@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 06:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: Emily Stark <estark@MIT.EDU>
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org
Message-ID: <1791109847.2868112.1337692844356.JavaMail.root@mozilla.com>
This question has me thinking about whether or not we should also ask another question, something like: "What does it mean for this API to be 'high-level' or 'low-level'?"



----- Original Message -----
From: "Emily Stark" <estark@MIT.EDU>
To: "David Dahl" <ddahl@mozilla.com>
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:30:08 AM
Subject: Re: Web Crypto API Survey Questions

(sorry for the double-send, David!)
Would it make sense to have the low/high-level question have checkbox
answers instead of radios? I don't think they should be mutually exclusive
(we could have a low level API with high level wrappers) and many
developers might be interested in having both levels for different

On Monday, May 21, 2012, David Dahl wrote:

> Hello All:
> Here
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dHZ2aGw0YVRvRXVnN0d2bjFGR2FlN1E6MQis the survey mentioned in today's meeting. Wan-Teh and I have contributed
> questions - If you have additional questions to add or other edits please
> do so in this thread.
> Regards,
> David
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 13:21:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:01:01 UTC