- From: David Dahl <ddahl@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 10:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org, Zooko Wilcox-OHearn <zooko@leastauthority.com>
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com> > To: "Zooko Wilcox-OHearn" <zooko@leastauthority.com> > Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:16:36 AM > Subject: Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] Deciding the algorithms supported by the API > > >> For signing/MAC: > >> | HS256 | HMAC using SHA-256 hash algorithm > >> | | > >> | ES256 | ECDSA using P-256 curve and SHA-256 hash > >> | | > > Hmm... I realize that many people would prefer we only use EC, but > I'm > having a lot of trouble understanding the usefulness of a crypto API > which can't interoperate with the vast majority of cryptographic > systems > in current deployment, which generally use RSA and/or DH. I agree. There is also the issue of implementations that may not be able to use EC for the foreseeable future. Regards, David
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 17:04:15 UTC