- From: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:25:28 +0200
- To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- CC: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Hi Eric, - Audit : was intended to be a discovery mechanism. - Your comments : will try to take into account during the call if you do not show up. - F2F date : depending on participants availability, I may suggest another date in august. Feel free to comment the minutes once available. Regards, Virginie gemalto -----Original Message----- From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:ekr@rtfm.com] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 6:20 PM To: GALINDO Virginie Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org Subject: Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] - agenda for 21st of May 2012 I seem to have a conflict today, so I will be late if I am on the call at all. I've sent some comments to the list... On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:12 AM, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com> wrote: > See proposal and comments > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2012May/0074.html > ==> PROPOSED RESOLUTION : the API will implement means to audit the > environment and gets (a) the list of all supported algorithm and (b) > the support of a specific set of algorithm I don't understand what "audit" means in this setting. Is that different from feature discovery? -Ekr > ==> PROPOSED RESOLUTION : Next F2F will be on the week 23 to 27th of July in Vancouver, host to be found. I, at least, doubt I can make this. As I said, two weeks of standards meetings in a row is a real problem for some people. -Ekr
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 16:26:19 UTC