- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:22:43 -0700
- To: David Dahl <ddahl@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, public-webcrypto@w3.org, Nadim Kobeissi <nadim@nadim.cc>
I agree. This is no more in scope than concerns over buffer overflows because the browsers are written in C++. -Ekr On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:42 PM, David Dahl <ddahl@mozilla.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ryan Sleevi" <sleevi@google.com> >> To: "Nadim Kobeissi" <nadim@nadim.cc> >> Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org >> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 3:09:54 PM >> Subject: Re: The Adequacy of HTTPS as a Transport > >> My own view is that any discussion of transport security would be out of scope > > Yes. This is very much out of scope. We should keep a laser focus on the API. > > Regards, > > David >
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 07:24:00 UTC