Thanks Eric I had looked to try to find exactly this before emailing and apparently didn't try hard enough. On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:24 PM Eric Roman <ericroman@google.com> wrote: > Also for reference: > > Discussion about removing SHA-224 from Web Crypto (it was in earlier > drafts) > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2014Feb/0051.html > > Removal of SHA-224 from the spec: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/rev/3f7df730b2c7 > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:27 AM, Calvin Metcalf <calvin.metcalf@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> ok thanks I didn't see anything when I googled around, I'm working on a >> library that attempts to wrap node crypto or this api behind a single api. >> So I may have some more questions and I'll definitely have some feedback. >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:30 AM Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 19, 2015 10:50 PM, "Calvin Metcalf" <calvin.metcalf@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > sha-224 was omitted from the spec. Is this intentional and if so why? >>> >>> Yes, this is intentional. >>> >>> Because it is not widely supported, nor were there many use cases for it >>> (as also evidenced by the lack of wide support). >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 17:44:06 UTC