Re: sha-224 from Ryan Sleevi on 2015-10-20 (public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org from October 2015)

From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:30:51 -0700
To: Calvin Metcalf <calvin.metcalf@gmail.com>
Cc: public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <CACvaWvY7MB6SYx-xVa5iV23gONN2Cxe8vPxqJ7Cod9v2njqmBA@mail.gmail.com>

On Oct 19, 2015 10:50 PM, "Calvin Metcalf" <calvin.metcalf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> sha-224 was omitted from the spec.  Is this intentional and if so why?

Yes, this is intentional.

Because it is not widely supported, nor were there many use cases for it
(as also evidenced by the lack of wide support).

Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 06:31:53 UTC