- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:10:58 +0200
- To: "public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org" <public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org>
Apparently the writeup of the Korean bank-case didn't got a particularly favorable review. If I were them I wouldn't be too concerned about that because none of the three giant US tech vendors that define some 99% of our client platforms have managed getting much acceptance for their PKI solutions by Asian and EU banks either. In fact, most banks replace this part with a custom solution both for enrollment and authentication/signatures which also was the motivation behind the Korean bank use-case. Somewhat related the TrustedComputingGroup (which I'm an invited expert member of), have through their core members indirectly rejected the bank use-case. In some way this is quite understandable since there's no paying customer out there, but it also feels slightly non-visionary because on-line banking is really just another BYOD scenario, albeit taken to another level. Anders
Received on Saturday, 27 July 2013 04:11:37 UTC