- From: Aymeric Vitte <vitteaymeric@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:41:58 +0100
- To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- CC: public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org
Probably you have corrected by yourself but the example I gave below can be handled via process/progress, so has nothing to do with Issue-22 which remains only about hash Le 18/12/2012 17:42, Aymeric Vitte a écrit : > No in fact, use cases I did provide indeed can be solved by Issue-22 > > But if I am correct topics related to Issue-22 in the documentation > only refer to hash, for the record I did provide a use case where it's > valid for encryption too ( > https://github.com/Ayms/node-Tor/blob/master/lib/node-tor.js#l629-650 ) > > Le 17/12/2012 10:50, Ryan Sleevi a écrit : >> >> You have not provided a use case where it is necessary to map 1:1 the >> inputs and outputs, *except* when being considered with respect to >> ISSUE-22. Which is exactly what is thorny about ISSUE-22. >> >> Can you share a use case that is not inextricably linked to cloning >> cryptographic state? >> > -- jCore Email : avitte@jcore.fr iAnonym : http://www.ianonym.com node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms Web : www.jcore.fr Webble : www.webble.it Extract Widget Mobile : www.extractwidget.com BlimpMe! : www.blimpme.com
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 17:39:38 UTC