- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:33:29 +0200
- To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- CC: "public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org" <public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org>
On 2012-10-24 18:52, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Anders Rundgren > <anders.rundgren@telia.com> wrote: >> NSS: Supports ECDSA but when used in Firefox (the User Agent) it is not except if you add a suitable *external* crypto provider. >> >> Windows: .NET 4.5 supports ECDSA but not for usage in TLS (WCF). Seems to be the case even for W8. >> >> Android: KeyChain in JellyBean (4.1) seems to not support ECDSA although it is hard to say since the KeyChain documentation is virtually non-existent (the source code is the documentation?). >> >> I guess the RIM patent is still the issue here? >> >> Anders >> > > This has been discussed previously at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2012Jul/0131.html Nice table, all items in a one-dimensional list! .NET crypto is as dysfunctional as in Android: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.security.cryptography.asymmetricalgorithm.aspx "The DSACryptoServiceProvider class is an implementation of a digital signature algorithm. You can also use RSACryptoServiceProvider to create and verify a digital signature. The System.Security.Cryptography namespace provides concrete classes for RSA and DSA only." I had to switch to BouncyCastle for my SKS/KeyGen2 .NET implementation. Mike's table isn't only unreadable, it is also incorrect. Anders > > I suggest if you have you contributions to make to the table, Mike > Jones would be appreciative. As it is, all of the platforms you > mention are already covered. > > The support in TLS client libraries is orthogonal to the support in > the low-level cryptographic stack, just like it is orthogonal to the > support within certificate validation/verification libraries. While > they share some overlap, statements about an TLS stack cannot be used > to infer or disprove support within the low-level implementation or > within an X.509 stack. >
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 18:34:02 UTC