- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:30:33 +0200
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- CC: "public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org" <public-webcrypto-comments@w3.org>, Vijay Bharadwaj <Vijay.Bharadwaj@microsoft.com>, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
On 2012-10-11 22:16, Harry Halpin wrote: > On 10/11/2012 04:46 PM, Anders Rundgren wrote: >> Given the somewhat hard-to-follow discussions on the public-webcrypto list, I think the time has come to outline how applications like the subject line should be architected and what kind of vulnerabilities they would have (in contrast to statically installed applications). >> >> I would also like to see a concrete proposal for accessing existing keys based on system-wide cryptographic sub-systems like featured in Windows and Android. >> >> Although Ryan is the lead editor, it can hardly be his task to do all the work or respond to every question, right? > > No any WG member can respond, although it is the job of the editors to > make sure that comments are taken care of in the spec if the WG gets > consensus to tackle the issue and the issue is not out of scope as > regards the charter. > > If you would like to see a concrete proposal, I suggest you write it > yourself. I'm sure the WG would be very happy to see it. Dear Harry, I have already provided a concrete proposal on the comment list: http://webpki.org/papers/PKI/pki-webcrypto.pdf It describes pretty well (I hope...) a *security and trust model for pre-provisioned keys* of the type that I believe are most relevant for "Signed high-value transactions". The scheme departs considerably from the origin-based concept but that is not only a drawback because it is equally applicable to transient web-code as to explicitly installed applications including iOS/Android/WP "apps". The proposal also highlights a fundamental issue regarding keys as "personal" resources which IMO have a huge impact on the rest: Do we maybe need two different trust models? The WG has yet to gather all the divergent comments on the mailing list and make something useful of it with respect to pre-provisioned keys of the kind represented by the "Korean Use-case". It would for example be quite interesting hearing what Microsoft or Gemalto believe is the right approach for dealing with pre-provisioned keys in a web-application using Web Crypto. Cheers, Anders > > cheers, > harry > >> >> Anders >> > >
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 03:31:05 UTC