Re: IoT Payments

Sounds good. I'll do some work on use cases before then

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 18:46 Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

>
>
> > On Feb 13, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > We have about 15 minutes available on the 26 January call.
>
> Correction: 26 February.
>
>
> Ian
>
> > If you think that is enough to introduce the topic, then
> > we can likely accommodate it. (I will confirm with the Chairs). Would
> you be leading the discussion?
> >
> > Here is a link to our TPAC discussion on IOT payments:
> > https://www.w3.org/2017/11/09-wpay-minutes#item03
> >
> > My apologies - attempts to convene a task force since then have fallen
> through.
> >
> > I think it would help the conversation (and drive interest) if you
> could  share more on this thread
> > about the use cases and scope you have in mind.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Feb 13, 2018, at 4:15 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@ripple.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Trying again to the correct mailing list
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@ripple.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi David, the rest of the IG, Ian and Wendy
> >>
> >> Apologies for not making the last IG call, I have reviewed the minutes
> and wanted to suggest we consider gathering a forum of interested people to
> tackle the IoT payments use cases.
> >> Can we do this using IG time on the next call or would the chairs
> prefer we initiate a parallel stream and report back to the IG?
> >>
> >> I believe the challenge we have is that any standard we develop is one
> of those that sits uncomfortably in the "Web Technologies" domain but
> without clear implementers given that these are unlikely to be the
> traditional browser vendors that are implementing PR and PH API.
> >>
> >> As you are aware I submitted a very "drafty" proposal to the IETF in
> Singapore that attempts to leverage the work on PR API but package this
> into HTTP requests[1]. The response from the HTTP WG at IETF was that we
> should continue to evolve this and leverage Wendy as the W3C liaison to
> IETF in getting input from the HTTP WG as we go.
> >>
> >> As I have found with the Interledger work, while there is interest from
> the Internet/Web and technical community in accommodating these standards,
> payments is outside their usual scope and so they depend on "payments"
> people to do the groundwork and they can advise on the appropriate
> technical solutions.
> >>
> >> We (Ripple and the Interledger CG) are very interested in progressing
> this work as we have already done extensive work on these non-interactive
> uses cases with Interledger as the payment method.
> >>
> >> Looking to Ian and the chairs for guidance on how to proceed?
> >>
> >> Adrian
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> > Tel: +1 718 260 9447
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>
>
>
> --
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse any typos