[LC Review] of WebCGM 2.0

Hello,

These are comments on

WebCGM 2.0, http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-webcgm20-20060623/

sent on behalf of the i18n core working group.

Best regards, Felix Sasaki.

Comment 1 (editorial): <title> elements in some files are confusing
It seems that some <title> elements contain "OASIS CGM Open
specification - ...", e.g.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-webcgm20-20060623/WebCGM20-TOC.html
"OASIS CGM Open specification - WebCGM Profile - Expanded Table of Contents"
This is just confusing and should be fixed.

Comment 2 (editorial): Reference to Unicode
In
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-webcgm20-20060623/WebCGM20-Intro.html#norm-ref
 , you have two references to Unicode, one generic reference, and one to
version 4.01. Is there a reason for that? If not, please reference to
Unicode following the description at
http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#sec-RefUnicode , that is, only in a
generic manner.

Comment 3 (editorial): Why not Unicode as the default encoding?
In
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-webcgm20-20060623/WebCGM20-Concepts.html#webcgm_2_4
, (sec. 2.5.4), you describe isolatin1 as the default "character set".
We would propose to describe UTF-8 as the default character encoding,
and to use the term "character encoding" instead of "character set". See
also http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#C020 .