- From: Bezaire, Benoit <bbezaire@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:02:01 -0400
- To: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
I'm in telecons all morning... Sorry. -----Original Message----- From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 8:39 PM To: WebCGM WG Subject: about Wednesday telecon... As you might gather from the beginning of my below message, I don't think we have an agenda that warrants a telecon. I would like to chat with Stuart about W3C-OASIS coordination, but will arrange that off-line. (If anyone want to join such an informal discussion, let me know.) Thanks, -Lofton. At 06:31 PM 10/6/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: >All -- > >We don't have any technical content to discuss at the Wednesday >teleconference, except for Dave's schema contribution. (I reckon that I >should give longer advance notice of that as a telecon topic, so people >can prepare.) > >It might be time to start having a closer look at the schedule. However, >since Thierry can't attend, I think we can conduct any discussion by email >for now. > >BACKGROUND: >----- >About coordination, the W3C-OASIS MoU says... >[[[ >>[...resumption of processing in OASIS...] will be made on a date >>sufficiently prior to the W3C AC [PR] review, so that any further OASIS >>public review, revision or >>TC approval required by the OASIS TC Process is conducted during, and may >>be completed >>prior to the end of, the W3C AC [PR] review period. Any additional >>changes recommended during >>that OASIS process will be submitted back to W3C as AC comments... >]]] > >In other words, OASIS must complete its review and endorsement of changes >since CS (the beginning of the W3C phase) before the completion of the W3C >PR review. PR review starts at a time TBD after W3C CR completion. > >BACKGROUND: >----- >As presently planned, I am away and unable to work on WebCGM from 20 >October through 10 November. Thierry is unavailable until about mid-November. > >SCHEDULE CONSIDERATIONS: >----- > >1.) We now anticipate that it will take till 01 Nov, rather than 15 Oct, >to finish sufficient implementation work to exit CR with the features we want. > >2.) Next steps in W3C: produce PR document, coordinate PR-end date with >OASIS processing requirements, resolve to seek PR review and approval (AC >vote) to progress to REC. > >3.) Next steps in OASIS: approve the changes that happened in W3C with a >Public Review and CS vote by the TC (this would comprise the end of any >potential changes in OASIS). > -- 15-day public review of OASIS version of the W3C-PR document; > -- vote for CS (no significant wait time or duration). > -- at this point, the period for OASIS changes ends. > >4.) The CR document should have very few changes: right now, there is >just one editorial fix that I see is needed. Additionally, however, if >any at-risk features fail then they will be removed before PR and the >return-to-OASIS. > >5.) Recall that OASIS has some timing rules about requesting OS ballot, >relative to start of month etc. (Stuart?) > >ASSESSMENT: >----- >A critical path schedule dependency is indicate by the steps in #3 >above. That in turn will depend on CR-exit -- either all tests have >2-pass, or we decide to say "done" and drop some at-risk features. I >don't see how this can be done before 20 Oct., and then it will have to >wait till mid-Nov. So it looks like mid-Nov for coming back for OASIS >public review and CS ballot. > >Thoughts, anyone? > >-Lofton. > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 13:03:12 UTC