re: PR-advancement on hold

Don,

That's good news, thanks.  I'll update the implementation matrices.

I believe that the WG's advancement resolution is still valid.  We just 
ignore the subsequently discovered and fixed glitch in the results (re: 
rotateAnimation).

Right now, the timing is being determined by the restart of the OASIS 
process.  W3C PR (according to the MoU) has to be timed and coordinated 
with the end of the OASIS public review.  The start of the latter depends 
on how quickly OASIS TC admin can initiate review after this Wednesday's TC 
telecon.

Long story short, there is nothing to be done in W3C right now, pending 
completion of some OASIS steps.

Regards,
-Lofton.


At 11:54 AM 11/16/2009 -0600, Don Larson wrote:
>Lofton,
>I can confirm that we now Pass both the rotateAnimation and 
>setGetIntensity tests.
>
>
>Regards,
>Don Larson
>Larson Software Technology
>Tel: (713)977.4177 ext. 102
>www.cgmlarson.com
>
>  >  All --
>  >
>  >  We have a problem. Yesterday morning I got last-minute implementation
>  >  updates from two implementors. Unfortunately, it was not emphasized and I
>  >  did not notice till later that one of them downgraded his rotateAnimation
>  >  status from "Pass" to "Partial". So now we have for rotateAnimation: one
>  >  Pass (SDI); two Partial.
>  >
>  >  Unfortunately, this would seem to compromise our conditional 
> resolution for
>  >  PR advancement, and more urgently, steps to restart the OASIS process.
>  >
>  >  In any case, there is no question about removing any associated
>  >  rotateAnimation functionality. Therefore we must wait for at least one
>  >  "Partial" to become "Pass" before we can resume progression.
>  >
>  >  -Lofton.