- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:30:43 -0600
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
WebCGM WG -- The minutes of the teleconference are at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/03/11-webcgm-minutes.html and also available as text, below. [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ WebCGM telecon 11 Mar 2009 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Mar/0009.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/03/11-webcgm-irc Attendees Present don, lofton, Stuart, Dave, Thierry Absent Dieter, Benoit Chair lofton Scribe Stuart Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]roll call 11:00am ET 2. [6]WG timeline 3. [7]next F2F: Ann Arbor 4. [8]Confirm implementation of resolved issues 5. [9]new AIs to be assigned 6. [10]Adjourn * [11]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <scribe> scribe: Stuart <lofton> updated agenda: [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Mar/000 9.html [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Mar/0009.html minutes: [13]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/02/11-webcgm-minutes.h tml [13] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/02/11-webcgm-minutes.html roll call 11:00am ET absent: Dieter, Benoit WG timeline lofton: recent progress in test submittals has been made. If progress continues at this pace the test suitemay be done by the end of April 2009. This is a TC issue: the TC we needs to discuss converting the subString test from clear text into binary. The completion of the test suite is on the critical path. We need to avoid further schedule slides. If the proposed schedule cannot be met then features may have to be removed. Do people endorse Dave's proposed revised schedule? [all said "yes"] The alternative would be to go into a wait state until everything is implemented. <lofton> (W3C Charter will constrain us from indefinite wait-state, so there must be a definite plan for completion of features.) A test fest and last call comments disposition can be done in a single meeting in the late July timeframe. Don: notes that significant progress has been made since the beginning of the year, and if we keep the momentum we should be able to keep the schedule. The quality of the test are improving significantly. next F2F: Ann Arbor The TC needs to discuss this as well but it looks like April might not be a good time for the face to face meting. The end of April will be too late for the technical issues but too early for a last call/test fest. The April dates should be held open so we might be able to have a "virtual face to face" consisting of daily calls/webex and other parts of the day reserved to work on action items (homework) from the calls. <lofton> Everyone! -- please keep those 3 days blocked out for 2.1-project time -- telecons and off-line work. <Dave> I endorse the concept of using the end of april for telecon time and July for F2F Confirm implementation of resolved issues Look in the (current-editor draft) WebCGM 2.1 Change Log (Appendix D) for the details of all changes, but there are 6 new bits that have been added for recently closed issues. Have we missed any issues that have been raise and that have been resolved? resolution: All open issues have been resolved and are in the draft. new AIs to be assigned we will defer this until later. Is there anything else that needs to be discussed? Adjourn Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version 1.133 ([15]CVS log) $Date: 2009/03/12 15:24:49 $ _________________________________________________________ [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 15:31:38 UTC