- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:40:08 -0600
- To: tmichel@w3.org
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Thierry -- Thanks for your work on this. The DoC looks good. Thanks also for your work on the draft reply message to Innovax. I'll send that shortly (after you & I sort out that small format issue that I wrote to you about). Regards, -Lofton. At 12:49 PM 7/28/2009 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >Lofton, > >I have updated the Disposition of comments, it now shows the 2 LCs. >I have included the comment sent by Innovax. >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html > > > >Henderson a écrit : >>Thierry -- >> >>What's next for the two comments? As I recall, we incorporate them and >>the replies into a Disposition of Comments (DoC) document, send it to >>commenter, and ask him to approve the disposition. >> >>Does that DoC document need to be a new and separate document for >>LCWD2? Or is it a cumulative document, with all comments from all prior >>reviews included, or what? (I can do this if you will clarify what ... >>"new" or "cumulative".) >> >>Thanks, >>-Lofton. >> >>At 04:46 PM 7/27/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: >>>All -- >>> >>>For the record, the WG unanimously approved [1] & [2] as the WG >>>responses to the two comments from "Mohamed ZERGAOUI" of Innovimax SARL. >>> >>>The 7 affirmative replies are: [...snip...] >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jul/0019.html >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 16:40:56 UTC