- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:42:58 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton, The procedure for the 2 comments is: 1- We send to the commenters the resolution of the WebCGM WG and ask him to approuve our response. (here is a template) 2- We add into the disposition of comment [2] with the 2 new comments of this second Last Call [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/2008Dec/0005.html [2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html Thierry. Henderson a écrit : > Thierry -- > > What's next for the two comments? As I recall, we incorporate them > and the replies into a Disposition of Comments (DoC) document, send it > to commenter, and ask him to approve the disposition. > > Does that DoC document need to be a new and separate document for > LCWD2? Or is it a cumulative document, with all comments from all > prior reviews included, or what? (I can do this if you will clarify > what ... "new" or "cumulative".) > > Thanks, > -Lofton. > > At 04:46 PM 7/27/2009 -0600, Lofton Henderson wrote: >> All -- >> >> For the record, the WG unanimously approved [1] & [2] as the WG >> responses to the two comments from "Mohamed ZERGAOUI" of Innovimax SARL. >> >> The 7 affirmative replies are: [...snip...] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jul/0019.html > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 09:43:45 UTC