- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:55:34 -0700
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
WebCGM WG -- The minutes of today's meeting are at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html and also available as text, below. [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - WebCGM Telecon 15 Jan 2009 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0016.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-irc Attendees Present Dave, Lofton, Don, Ben, Stuart Regrets Thierry Chair Lofton Scribe Dave Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Al Gilman questions & remarks 2. [6]LC Review completion and DoC 3. [7]Production of next WD 4. [8]New technical threads 5. [9]next F2F: March or May or ...? * [10]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <scribe> Scribe: Dave Previous Minutes:[11]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/12/18-webcgm-m inutes.html [11] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/12/18-webcgm-minutes.html Topic: roll call 11:00am ET additions to agenda? None Al Gilman questions & remarks Stuart sent a comment - [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/001 8.html [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0018.html and Lofton followed up Lofton's comment - [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/001 9.html [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0019.html How should we follow up with Al, now? <lofton> Stuart says: "..need agreement all the way along the data chain to realize any of this", and Lofton says "..especially true since CGM is binary format, per WebCGM appendix E.1 (3rd pgph)" <scribe> ACTION: Lofton to communicate results of our discussion with Al Gilman [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action01] [14] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action01 <trackbot> Created ACTION-60 - Communicate results of our discussion with Al Gilman [on Lofton Henderson - due 2009-01-22]. <scribe> ACTION: Stuart to put together a first draft of a synopsis of his and Lofton's comments [recorded in [15]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action02] [15] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action02 <trackbot> Created ACTION-61 - Put together a first draft of a synopsis of his and Lofton's comments [on Stuart Galt - due 2009-01-22]. LC Review completion and DoC I18N approved explicitly Rob approved explicitly Benoit needs to explicity approve This will formally close the topic Benoit will review the DoC and formally approve resolutions Production of next WD Lofton will apply DoC document and any editorial comments that have come up and create a new draft Trickier LC issues will be carried forward Need Thierry to answer the question of - publish soon in TR, to close the 1st LC cycle? <lofton> I think we answered it here: we need to publish the WD of 1st LC closure (it's been 4 months since we've published) New technical threads Error in SP valid values designation - [16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/001 0.html [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0010.html Dave clarified the valid values Ben pointed out that a test needs to be corrected - Forrest will fix Lofton will take to take the editorial task to correct the section Edge vis -- moot? - [17]http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00014 .html [17] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00014.html Ben agreed that the Edge Visibility issue is moot Tangent on discussion of Interior Style There are several tests that need to be corrected to make sure Internal Style is set to correct values to correspond to the actual test. Initial Values of new 2.1 SPs -- open - [18]http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00034 .html [18] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00034.html We evidently erred when we defined the initial values. At the opening of an APS, all SP's have known, well-defined, values whether they come from the statelist of metafile default. Initial values should be 'metafile'. Interior-style SP -- open - [19]http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00019 .html [19] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00019.html Thread is ongoing in the TC and we will defer it here until the TC has a chance to look at it (getting input from TC-not-WG members). next F2F: March or May or ...? Defer to a TC topic next week (so that the other two implementors are involved.) Adjourn: 1208 EST Next telecon: 29 January 2009 Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Lofton to communicate results of our discussion with Al Gilman [recorded in [20]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: Stuart to put together a first draft of a synopsis of his and Lofton's comments [recorded in [21]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action02] [20] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action01 [21] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action02 [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [22]scribe.perl version 1.133 ([23]CVS log) $Date: 2009/01/15 23:51:27 $ _________________________________________________________ [22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 00:05:09 UTC