- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:55:34 -0700
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
WebCGM WG --
The minutes of today's meeting are at
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html
and also available as text, below.
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
WebCGM Telecon
15 Jan 2009
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0016.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-irc
Attendees
Present
Dave, Lofton, Don, Ben, Stuart
Regrets
Thierry
Chair
Lofton
Scribe
Dave
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Al Gilman questions & remarks
2. [6]LC Review completion and DoC
3. [7]Production of next WD
4. [8]New technical threads
5. [9]next F2F: March or May or ...?
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<scribe> Scribe: Dave
Previous
Minutes:[11]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/12/18-webcgm-m
inutes.html
[11] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/12/18-webcgm-minutes.html
Topic: roll call 11:00am ET
additions to agenda?
None
Al Gilman questions & remarks
Stuart sent a comment -
[12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/001
8.html
[12]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0018.html
and Lofton followed up
Lofton's comment -
[13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/001
9.html
[13]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0019.html
How should we follow up with Al, now?
<lofton> Stuart says: "..need agreement all the way along the data
chain to realize any of this", and Lofton says "..especially true
since CGM is binary format, per WebCGM appendix E.1 (3rd pgph)"
<scribe> ACTION: Lofton to communicate results of our discussion
with Al Gilman [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action01]
[14] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action01
<trackbot> Created ACTION-60 - Communicate results of our discussion
with Al Gilman [on Lofton Henderson - due 2009-01-22].
<scribe> ACTION: Stuart to put together a first draft of a synopsis
of his and Lofton's comments [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action02]
[15] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action02
<trackbot> Created ACTION-61 - Put together a first draft of a
synopsis of his and Lofton's comments [on Stuart Galt - due
2009-01-22].
LC Review completion and DoC
I18N approved explicitly
Rob approved explicitly
Benoit needs to explicity approve
This will formally close the topic
Benoit will review the DoC and formally approve resolutions
Production of next WD
Lofton will apply DoC document and any editorial comments that have
come up and create a new draft
Trickier LC issues will be carried forward
Need Thierry to answer the question of - publish soon in TR, to
close the 1st LC cycle?
<lofton> I think we answered it here: we need to publish the WD of
1st LC closure (it's been 4 months since we've published)
New technical threads
Error in SP valid values designation -
[16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/001
0.html
[16]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0010.html
Dave clarified the valid values
Ben pointed out that a test needs to be corrected - Forrest will fix
Lofton will take to take the editorial task to correct the section
Edge vis -- moot? -
[17]http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00014
.html
[17]
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00014.html
Ben agreed that the Edge Visibility issue is moot
Tangent on discussion of Interior Style
There are several tests that need to be corrected to make sure
Internal Style is set to correct values to correspond to the actual
test.
Initial Values of new 2.1 SPs -- open -
[18]http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00034
.html
[18]
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00034.html
We evidently erred when we defined the initial values.
At the opening of an APS, all SP's have known, well-defined, values
whether they come from the statelist of metafile default.
Initial values should be 'metafile'.
Interior-style SP -- open -
[19]http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00019
.html
[19]
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200901/msg00019.html
Thread is ongoing in the TC and we will defer it here until the TC
has a chance to look at it (getting input from TC-not-WG members).
next F2F: March or May or ...?
Defer to a TC topic next week (so that the other two implementors
are involved.)
Adjourn: 1208 EST
Next telecon: 29 January 2009
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Lofton to communicate results of our discussion with
Al Gilman [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Stuart to put together a first draft of a synopsis of
his and Lofton's comments [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action02]
[20] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action01
[21] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html#action02
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [22]scribe.perl version 1.133
([23]CVS log)
$Date: 2009/01/15 23:51:27 $
_________________________________________________________
[22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 16 January 2009 00:05:09 UTC