[Minutes] WebCGM Telecon 2009-01-28

WebCGM WG --

The minutes of the teleconference are at

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/28-webcgm-minutes.html

and also available as text, below.

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                             WebCGMTeleconf

28 Jan 2009

    [2]Agenda

       [2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0067.html

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/28-webcgm-irc

Attendees

    Present : Dave, Don, Lofton, Stuart, Thierry
    Regrets
           Benoit, Dieter

    Chair
           Lofton

    Scribe
           Thierry

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]roll call 11:00am ET
          2. [6]Publication of 20090130 WD
          3. [7]next F2F: March 23,24,25, Sophia
          4. [8]new AIs to be assigned
      * [9]Summary of Action Items
      _________________________________________________________

      *  Previous minutes:
        [10]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/15-webcgm-minut
        es.html
      * Agenda:
        [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan
        /0067.html

      [10] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html
      [11] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Jan/0067.html

    Zakim doc: [12]http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Scribing.html

      [12] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Scribing.html

    see 2.3. Caller IDs are associated with IRC nicks

    I am ready

Roll call 11:00am ET

    Nothing to report.

Publication of 20090130 WD

    WebCGM 2.1 second draft is ready for publication on Friday jan 15th.
    The document is already in TR space but do not advertise yet until
    it is formally published by Comm Team.
    [13]http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-webcgm21-20090130/

      [13] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-webcgm21-20090130/

    Disposition of comments.
    [14]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.h
    tml

      [14] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html

    All 13 comments were received and processed and agreed by
    commenters. We are done.
    When we issue a second Last call we will reuse this current
    disposition of comments to track and respond to further
    comments.Currently the disposition of comments stays at its
    location. Will be moved for CR.

    We have a growing list of internal issues. These are resolved at the
    TC and during this call.

    Once the WebCGM 2.1 second draft is published, Thierry to update the
    webcgm WG home page accordingly.

Next F2F: March 23,24,25, Sophia

    Is attendance insufficient?

    Dieter and Benoit may not participate. Not sure about Stuart.

    Stuart should get a response by next week

    might have to revisit meeting in Sophia

    Dave: meeting in europe or not is not a requirement. If in the right
    place may pick up Rob

    Don: I can meet end of march, but if can not have Stuart, not a good
    idea

    North America would make it easier to get people attending

    Don: would be good to see this thing rolling. And start
    implementations.

    Lofton: +1
    ... Dave favors north america. Don does not really care.

    Seattle would probably be a good place.

    Benoit could do something in the North east. could drive to Boston.

    We have aW3C facility or PTC in Boston.

    Lofton: hear your point about Seattle
    ... we are in a wait mode

    Seattle is 9 hours difference with France

    Lofton: wait for PTC for a decision.
    ... would like to get feedback from implementers
    ... not going to process Last Call comments during this F2F
    ... goal is to flush out Testsuite and have a document rather stable

    <lofton> (Going to process internal, test-driven and
    implementation-driven comments to *make* 2nd LC text.)

    Lofton: Late march would be a good idea, could be done in Sophia

    Due to restriction we probably will only have one meeting (no
    interop meeting during in CR)

    Thierry : Do we expect more substantial changes ?

    Lofton: So far most of the changes are editorial and some are
    substantial

    see item 4 in the agenda

    example h). is a small change but not editorial

    example e). is discussed internally.

    these issues are raised and resolved in the WG. should not raise
    opposition from external review

    lofton: So we need a meeting late march. Will have another look at
    the venue. If it has an impact on attendance.

    Stuart: could rediscuss next week at TC

    Lofton: ... does not need to start technical issues today.
    ... need to have PTC and other input.
    Looking at the issue list

    ... a) and b) are resolved from last week minutes

    so is c) we agreed Interior-style is needed

    d) is resolved, should be changed to 'metafile'

    Resolution: WebCGM agrees that these 4 (a, b, d are resolved)

    k.) and m) are also resolved, these are only typos

    come back in two weeks for the rest of the issues

New AIs to be assigned

    Benoit identify one test needing fixing and is asking for a better
    test

    identify "several tests" need fixing Int.Styl.

    make sure they are doing the good test

    Stuart: got these two items

    lofton: reviewers for these tests ?

    Forest is the author, Don is the reviewer ?

    Don: will do the review in a week or so. started to look at it in my
    implementation.

    lofton: anything else to talk about today ?

    Next telecon: 11 February 2009

    Adjourned

    previous minutes:
    [15]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.h
    tml

      [15] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2009/01/15-webcgm-minutes.html

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]
      _________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [16]scribe.perl version 1.133
     ([17]CVS log)
     $Date: 2009/02/02 04:53:36 $
      _________________________________________________________

      [16] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
      [17] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Monday, 2 February 2009 05:00:14 UTC