- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 12:53:17 -0600
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Robert Orosz <roboro@auto-trol.com>, Forrest Carpenter <forrest@sdicgm.com>,Ulrich Läsche <ulrich@cgmtech.de>
All -- During TS and implementation development in the TC, a handful of issues has come up that have not yet been processed by the WG. Below are pointers to those discussion threads for those issues. Most of you have already seen these. These will be on the WG agenda for this week's vF2F telecons. Please review them. We intend to close all issues by CoB Wednesday. 1.) editorial issue with 'scale()' method: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00051.html (Proposed: change wording as in email message.) 2.) QUESTION: 'maplist' or 'mapList'? http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00066.html (Proposed: camel-case the 'maplist' and 'dashlength' deviations.) 3.) ACI substitution of non-existent font: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00037.html (Proposed: no change, it is clear in the text) 4.) getObjectExtent and text (thread splits): http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00077.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00078.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00116.html (Proposed: discuss & chose the right metric points, normatively include the info.) 5.) ACI DTD and conformance: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00100.html (Proposed: Dave's new wording.) 6.) upgrade XML 1.0 references to 5th Edition: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00104.html Comments: #1, #2, #3 seem to have reached consensus. If you have any contrary opinions, then please send them by email before the vF2F starts. #5 is mostly about drafting the fix-it text, which Dave has done. #6 looks simple and necessary, but we should check about any changed conformance requirements. #4 just came up and is still under discussion -- seeking input from all the implementors (how did they implement the 'boxed-all' Restricted Text style?) Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Sunday, 26 April 2009 18:54:24 UTC