- From: David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:22:53 -0700
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 20:23:30 UTC
For discussion during the vF2F on a conformance statement for ACI files. I actually just added the identifiers and simplified the conformance to state that it must be "valid" as defined in XML. thx...Dave On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:06 PM, David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>wrote: > I'll give it a shot... > > Dave > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>wrote: > >> ACI DTD and conformance: >> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200904/msg00100.html >> >> I think there is general agreement that that section 9.2 [1] is >> under-specified compared to what it ought to contain. >> >> Dave, would you be willing to draft and circulate changes, for us to >> discuss and approve next week? >> >> -Lofton. >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/current-editor-21/WebCGM21-Config.html#ACI-content >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 24 April 2009 20:23:30 UTC