- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:26:51 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton, Regrets, I will not be able to attend as I am in WG meetings all week at TPAC. Henderson wrote: > > All, > > Should we have a WG telecon this week, at our normal Thursday 11am ET > slot? Or should we cancel this one (next one would then be two weeks, > Nov. 6th)? > > I don't see a lot to discuss. Implementation and test work have been > lagging, and as a result comments (from WebCGM-ers) are light. > > Below I have listed the comments of which I'm aware. They all seem > straightforward except [4], about which some discussion is still in > progress. > > Thoughts? (And have I missed any comments?) > > -Lofton. > > [1] String limits: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/2008Sep/0001.html > [2] WebCGMRect::union: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0000.html > [3] getObjectExtent: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0015.html > [4] CGZ: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Oct/0020.html > [5] [...in the TC, discussion/clarification about set/getAttributeNS()...] > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2008 15:27:31 UTC