Re: webcgm in TR

Lofton Henderson wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> I just noticed this:
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webcgm20/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/webcgm21/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/webcgm/
> 
> [1] and [2] point to the expected things.  


Right


What should [3] point to?
> 
> ** Is it "latest WebCGM recommendation"?

Yes.



> ** Or is it "latest TR version of WebCGM"?

no that is
http://www.w3.org/TR/webcgm21/
> 
> I think there was some discussion about this with Ian a couple years 
> ago, but I can't recall the conclusion.  (I can probably find it in the 
> archives, if you don't recall.)
> 
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
> 

Received on Friday, 10 October 2008 16:00:23 UTC