- From: Galt, Stuart A <stuart.a.galt@boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:09:46 -0700
- To: "Bezaire, Benoit" <bbezaire@ptc.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 20:11:23 UTC
Hello, I think that getUnion() would be similar to our other get/set routines. But do not have very strong feelings one way or another. Stuart. ________________________________ From: Bezaire, Benoit [mailto:bbezaire@ptc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:34 AM To: WebCGM WG Subject: ISSUE: WebCGMRect::union union() is not a good method name. Given that 'union' is a C/C++ keyword, it cannot get compiled by the MIDL compiler (on Windows). We need a new name. Either: i) Union(): but we have so far, started method names using lower cap characters. ii) calcUnion() or getUnion(): or something similar. Benoit.
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 20:11:23 UTC