- From: Bezaire, Benoit <bbezaire@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:51:13 -0500
- To: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:51:50 UTC
Also, there is nothing in the wording explaining how to handle view rectangles which have a different aspect ratio than the viewer's viewport. Which will happen in 99% of the cases. ________________________________ From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bezaire, Benoit Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 8:58 AM To: WebCGM WG Subject: Question about setView() I'm wondering if the wording of setView() is not a bit short? The draft doesn't say anything about invalid rectangles being passed in for example. Should more feedback be sent to the user? Currently, the function prototype has a void return type. Should we change that to a boolean or something else? or throw an exception perhaps. I also question the possibility of a major scale change, ex: scaling in by a factor of 100 (and loosing sight of the overall picture). Should the user be told that such a change occurred? Thoughts? Benoit.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 16:51:50 UTC