- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:34:09 +0100
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Hi Lofton, I edited/added the new 5 comments sent by I18N. And see responses in line. Henderson wrote: > Hi Thierry, > > I have done a little editing on the DoC and put it here: > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2008/WebCGM21-LC-comments.html > > Notes: > > 1.) all 4 issues are included now. > 2.) I put "proposed resolution" for each one except the last, CGZ. > 3.) when that is done, we can endorse the 4 by email or by meeting vote. > 4.) then they become "WG resolution". > > A few small comments: > > 5.) Does the status "Status: Comment not yet discussed in the WG" seem a > little odd for these cases? We have indeed discussed in email, but not > actually endorsed the particular proposed resolutions? I have updated the status to [Status: Comment drafted] > 6.) I guess the status moves to "resolved" after (email or meeting) > endorsement of each one, yes? yes. > 7.) note how the formatting around the Resolution section changed > between #1 and #2 -- is this something I should work on? > > All for now. After we sort out these small questions, and solve the CGZ > question, we can put it to the WG for endorsement by email, or put it on > the next WG agenda. Sounds good. > > -Lofton. >
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 15:43:56 UTC