- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:48:07 +0100
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
Lofton Henderson wrote: > > Thierry, thanks for sending the correction. I guess we are done for > now, until we start getting responses. Right. The DoC is fully updated, > including links for all "Response sent to commenter is archived at:". Thanks for the update I had planed to do it latter today ... > > In the quiet time, I will start producing the edited spec, for a new WD > publication. Questions: > > -- is there a preferred place for us to put the evolving editor's drafts > (in WG space)? I think we can use http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/drafts/ > > -- we anticipate a 2nd last call in Jan-Feb timeframe, as implementation > work uncovers more issues. Should we use the same > yellow-with-red-border markup for everything? Or should we be fancy and > try to use markup to distinguish changes since 1st LCWD? (They will be > documented in the Change Log appendix, in any case.) I guess it depends if we want to get feedback on - the new changes introduced since 1er LCWD only - the new WebCGM 2.1 stuff. > > Regards, > -Lofton. >
Received on Monday, 22 December 2008 18:48:49 UTC