- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:40:33 -0600
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
WebCGM WG --
The minutes are at
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html
and also available as text, below.
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
WebCGM WG telecon
25 Oct 2007
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2007Oct/0037.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-irc
Attendees
Present
Benoit
Lofton
Stuart
Dave
Thierry
Regrets
dieter
Chair
lofton
Scribe
Benoit
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]routine business
2. [6]end of charter
* [7]Summary of Action Items
<lofton agenda item: roll call
<Stuart I think topics are done with topic:
routine business
<lofton none.
End of charter
LH: I have a few comments/questions
DC: yes I think so.
LH: Thierry sent us a draft charter
TM: a one year project is aggressive, it means Last Call comments in
July
LH: I think it will help make sure the project won't be 2 or 3 years
long.
TM: I think it would be a good idea, and we should consider
splitting requirements for a fast track WebCGM and a longer 3.0
specification
LH: I think it would be a good idea to say in the charter that we
expect this to be a relatively short project
BB: Since the work is shared between two WGs, it gives us less
control over the time period.
TM: the reason I have two drafts is because the W3C ask us to
publish every 3 months
LH: the problem with that is the coordination between the two groups
BB: what do we gain by saying that?
BB: I think the charter if fine as it is
LH: public-webcgm@w3.org is the wrong list for the group
LH: under mission and scope... it could be renamed Background
SG: I think renaming would be good.
LH: Requirements could be renamed to Mission and Scope
TM: ok
LH: About Relationship to other groups... these are mostly based for
2.0 work. all may not be relevant for 2.1
<Stuart I need to hang up now. My other meeting is starting
LH: Is there any way that other groups can be restricted to comment
on the delta only
TM: we could add a general statement that applies to all the group,
we would like feedback on the new 2.1 features, etc..
<scribe ACTION: Lofton to propose changes to Relationship to other
forums [recorded in
[8]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action01 ]
[8] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action01
<trackbot-ng Created ACTION-55 - Propose changes to Relationship to
other forums [on Lofton Henderson - due 2007-11-01].
<scribe ACTION: Dave to correct any links to Forums outside W3C
[recorded in
[9]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action02 ]
[9] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action02
<trackbot-ng Created ACTION-56 - Correct any links to Forums outside
W3C [on David Cruikshank - due 2007-11-01].
LH: next meeting should be in two weeks. lets try to have a new
draft by next week.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Dave to correct any links to Forums outside W3C
[recorded in
[10]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action02 ]
[10] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action02
[NEW] ACTION: Lofton to propose changes to Relationship to other
forums [recorded in
[11]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action01 ]
[11] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action01
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [12]scribe.perl version 1.128
([13]CVS log)
$Date: 2007/10/26 14:14:58 $
[12] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 23:41:03 UTC