- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:40:33 -0600
- To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
WebCGM WG -- The minutes are at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html and also available as text, below. [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ WebCGM WG telecon 25 Oct 2007 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2007Oct/0037.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-irc Attendees Present Benoit Lofton Stuart Dave Thierry Regrets dieter Chair lofton Scribe Benoit Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]routine business 2. [6]end of charter * [7]Summary of Action Items <lofton agenda item: roll call <Stuart I think topics are done with topic: routine business <lofton none. End of charter LH: I have a few comments/questions DC: yes I think so. LH: Thierry sent us a draft charter TM: a one year project is aggressive, it means Last Call comments in July LH: I think it will help make sure the project won't be 2 or 3 years long. TM: I think it would be a good idea, and we should consider splitting requirements for a fast track WebCGM and a longer 3.0 specification LH: I think it would be a good idea to say in the charter that we expect this to be a relatively short project BB: Since the work is shared between two WGs, it gives us less control over the time period. TM: the reason I have two drafts is because the W3C ask us to publish every 3 months LH: the problem with that is the coordination between the two groups BB: what do we gain by saying that? BB: I think the charter if fine as it is LH: public-webcgm@w3.org is the wrong list for the group LH: under mission and scope... it could be renamed Background SG: I think renaming would be good. LH: Requirements could be renamed to Mission and Scope TM: ok LH: About Relationship to other groups... these are mostly based for 2.0 work. all may not be relevant for 2.1 <Stuart I need to hang up now. My other meeting is starting LH: Is there any way that other groups can be restricted to comment on the delta only TM: we could add a general statement that applies to all the group, we would like feedback on the new 2.1 features, etc.. <scribe ACTION: Lofton to propose changes to Relationship to other forums [recorded in [8]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action01 ] [8] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action01 <trackbot-ng Created ACTION-55 - Propose changes to Relationship to other forums [on Lofton Henderson - due 2007-11-01]. <scribe ACTION: Dave to correct any links to Forums outside W3C [recorded in [9]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action02 ] [9] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action02 <trackbot-ng Created ACTION-56 - Correct any links to Forums outside W3C [on David Cruikshank - due 2007-11-01]. LH: next meeting should be in two weeks. lets try to have a new draft by next week. Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Dave to correct any links to Forums outside W3C [recorded in [10]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action02 ] [10] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action02 [NEW] ACTION: Lofton to propose changes to Relationship to other forums [recorded in [11]http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action01 ] [11] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/25-webcgm-minutes.html#action01 [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [12]scribe.perl version 1.128 ([13]CVS log) $Date: 2007/10/26 14:14:58 $ [12] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [13] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 23:41:03 UTC