- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:09:12 -0600
- To: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>,WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Aha, now it becomes clear... At 10:36 AM 10/15/2007 +0200, Thierry Michel wrote: >[...] >WebcCGM 1.0 errata published at final destination >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM-20011217-errata > > >I have updated the "This version link" which was still mentioning >http://www.w3.org/2007/WebCGM10-errata.html > >in our internal errata 1.0 page (still unchanged) >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html > >Curious as you said that you had fix this >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2007Oct/0016.html > >Maybe you should check with CVS that this is the proper version you finalized. I did indeed change my local copy appropriately. Then I sent it (Web Commander) to the wrong place -- I sent it to our internal location for the *2.0* errata. Remember during the telecon, how there was a copy of the 1.0 document at the 2.0 URL? Any case, thanks for catching and fixing it in the published version. To avoid confusion, I have just fixed our WG-internal version (..20070621..) to match your correct published version. -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 14:09:59 UTC