RE: 2.0 Errata review -- WG assignments

E05 Looks good to me.

--
Stuart Galt
SGML Resource Group
stuart.a.galt@boeing.com
(206) 544-3656

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 2:47 PM
> To: WebCGM WG
> Subject: 2.0 Errata review -- WG assignments
> 
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Repeating what we did with the 1.0 errata, I'd like each of 
> you to take a close look at 2.0 errata.  Since there are only 
> six of 'em, you are only
> *responsible* for one, as below.
> 
> However, we want to obtain WG approval of the 2.0 errata 
> collection at our next telecon.  This means that you should 
> familiarize yourself with the six of 'em before then.
> 
> Today we discussed and decided -- based on our light WG 
> workload, known travel plans, and avoiding conflict with TC 
> work schedule -- that the next telecon should be 11th October.
> 
> Dieter -- E02
> Benoit -- E03
> Dave -- E04
> Stuart -- E05
> Don -- E06
> Thierry -- E07
> 
> It would be good to email your review ("okay" or corrections) 
> to the WG list.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> -Lofton.
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-20/WebCGM20-e
rrata-draft.html
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 17:08:55 UTC