AW: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 15 February 2007

same here, next week would be better. 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von 
> Bezaire, Benoit
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2007 14:36
> An: Lofton Henderson; Chris Lilley
> Cc: WebCGM WG
> Betreff: RE: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 15 February 2007
> 
> 
> Postponing until next week works for me!
> 
> Actually, would another day than Thursday be better for the group? 
> 
> Benoit.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lofton Henderson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:03 PM
> To: Chris Lilley
> Cc: WebCGM WG
> Subject: Re: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 15 February 2007
> 
> 
> At 07:22 PM 2/14/2007 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
> >On Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 7:01:58 PM, Lofton wrote:
> >[...]
> >LH> Main topic: some initial discussion about how to go forward with 
> >LH> errata.  Chris's presence would be a bonus.
> >
> >I have a conflict; there is a staff meeting every week now, 
> at the same
> 
> >time as the WebCGM call.
> 
> I wonder, would it make sense to postpone the telecon till 
> next Thursday, when you (or Thierry) might be available?  As 
> it stands, I'm a bit rushed trying to finish some clarifying 
> conversations on the OASIS side.
> 
> Also ... I have noticed in the OASIS-side conversations that 
> some aspects of this take a *lot* of email to sort out what 
> would probably settle in 1/4
> - 1/2 hour of conversation.
> 
> If you have a regular conflict, we could start any time in 
> the 11-1230 ET window, or could even move the call forward by 
> 1/2 hour.
> 
> >[...]
> >However, I am happy to answer any erratta process questions 
> in email, 
> >ahead of the call.
> 
> I'll send one of the simpler ones along soon, in a separate message.
> 
> -Lofton.
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 13:49:57 UTC