W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: another new version of draft 1.0 errata

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:14:57 +0200
Message-ID: <46CD33F1.1080606@w3.org>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

Lofton,


The WebCGM 1.0 Second Release
W3C Recommendation, 17 December 2001 [1]

says
"Please report errors in this specification to the WebCGM document 
editor.[info@cgmopen.org]"

I am not sure who receives these mails at [info@cgmopen.org], but it 
should be sent to a W3C archived list.

We could had an errata here and say:

"Please report errors in this document to the public mailing list 
<public-webcgm@w3.org>. An archive is available at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/.


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-WebCGM-20011217/



  Henderson wrote:
> 
> 
> I put a fair amount of work into it, and hopefully it's getting in 
> decent shape for discussion purposes...
> 
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html 
> 
> 
> E04 and E05 are a bit rough yet, but even those should have enough 
> detail to understand the basic issue and proposal.
> 
> Some issues have surfaced.  Have a look at E02, for example -- it is 
> more complicated than it originally appeared.  Note also that I've 
> started to raise questions (e.g., in E01) that are process related, and 
> what we have to do to put it in process-acceptable form.
> 
> (Proper process alignment and document format is the last step, after we 
> sort out the substance of the errata, but it doesn't hurt to start 
> looking at it now.
> 
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 07:14:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:59:24 UTC