- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:14:57 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton, The WebCGM 1.0 Second Release W3C Recommendation, 17 December 2001 [1] says "Please report errors in this specification to the WebCGM document editor.[info@cgmopen.org]" I am not sure who receives these mails at [info@cgmopen.org], but it should be sent to a W3C archived list. We could had an errata here and say: "Please report errors in this document to the public mailing list <public-webcgm@w3.org>. An archive is available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm/. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-WebCGM-20011217/ Henderson wrote: > > > I put a fair amount of work into it, and hopefully it's getting in > decent shape for discussion purposes... > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html > > > E04 and E05 are a bit rough yet, but even those should have enough > detail to understand the basic issue and proposal. > > Some issues have surfaced. Have a look at E02, for example -- it is > more complicated than it originally appeared. Note also that I've > started to raise questions (e.g., in E01) that are process related, and > what we have to do to put it in process-acceptable form. > > (Proper process alignment and document format is the last step, after we > sort out the substance of the errata, but it doesn't hurt to start > looking at it now. > > Regards, > -Lofton. > > > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 07:14:57 UTC