- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:59:35 -0600
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>,public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
I'm confused... At 10:51 AM 6/8/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >Lofton Henderson wrote: > >[...] >But this one should be fixed in >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/20060608/WebCGM20-ECMA.html >Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed! > webcgm_ecma: 488, 500, 543 > >[...] >[1] >http://validator.w3.org/checklink?url=http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/20060608/&recursive=on When I run linkchecker, recursion depth 2, it does not show any errors in WebCGM20-ECMA.html. Furthermore, according to my text editor there are only 290 lines in the file. Furthermore, the whole file is a 'pre' except for the first few lines, and the only href are to the standard W3C stylesheets (in 'link'), and this: <p><a href="Overview.html">Up to cover page</a> | <a href="WebCGM20-Conf.html">Back to Conformance</a> | <a href="WebCGM20-Appendix.html">On to Appendixes</a></p> In other words, I cannot find the problem. You are reporting. In fact, I don't see those reported link errors in -ECMA, even with your line above [1]. HELP! (Is there a linkchecker bug?) Furthermore, when I run the checker line of yours [1] above, instead of simply running from the linkchecker page with the Web interface, I get some broken links/fragments associated with WebCGM20-Profile.html, and this is the first time I have *ever* seen these. Furthermore, when I run your line [1] with /current-editor/ instead of /20060608/, I don't see the -Profile complaints. Clearly something is happening that I don't understand, as I thought the files in /current-editor/ were the same as /20060608/, except for the Overview.html. Oh well. I guess we can resolve to advance "...with fixing of link problems". -Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 13:30:28 UTC