RE: proposed closure of CL-c10

All,

Benoit pointed out that I missed a couple changes to the text (to 
informative bits), so I just updated that file, in case you might have 
downloaded for study.

-Lofton.


At 10:46 AM 6/5/2006 -0700, Cruikshank, David W wrote:

>  The solution looks cleaner to me.  Suggest we carry it forward.
>
>Thx...Dave
>
>
>Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange
>Boeing Commercial Airplane
>206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734  <-- NEW NUMBERS
>david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
>Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:32 AM
>To: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
>Subject: proposed closure of CL-c10
>
>
>All,
>
>Benoit and I have collaborated to produce a proposed solution to the
>last remaining issue, CL-c10 (Boeing #25, [0]).
>
>The below draft illustrates the solution.  We have revised 3.1.2.2 [1]
>and
>3.1.2.7 [2] to be more CDF friendly, less HTML-frame specific.  We have
>preserved most of the former specific H2C, C2C, and C2H stuff as
>examples of correct usage for these media types and presentation
>contexts.
>
>Comments?
>
>We propose that this becomes part of the Last Call text.
>
>-Lofton.
>
>[0]
>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/20060528/proposed-changes-boein
>g/proposed-changes-boeing.html
>[1]
>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/current-editor/WebCGM20-IC-clc1
>0.html#webcgm_3_1_2_2
>[2]
>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/drafts/current-editor/WebCGM20-IC-clc1
>0.html#webcgm_3_1_2_7

Received on Monday, 5 June 2006 21:04:10 UTC