- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:27:00 +0200
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- CC: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Chris Lilley wrote: > On Wednesday, July 26, 2006, 10:07:07 AM, Thierry wrote: > > > TM> Lofton, > > > TM> I have edited and published the following on the W3C site: > > > TM> WebCGM 2.0 Implementation Report > TM> http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/implementation-report.html > > > TM> WebCGM 2.0 Test Suite > TM> http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/testsuite.html > > I suggest adding, right after > > This Test Suite does not cover all WebCGM 2.0 features. It only covers the new DOM-related and XCF features, and the new static and "intelligence" features -- the 2.0 additions to WebCGM 1.0. > > the following > > WebCGM 2.0 implementations are therefore expected also to pass the WebCGM 1.0 test suite. Done . Good catch. > > The reason that I want this to be explicit is to allay any concerns over 'delta specifications'. sure. The imlplementation reports only the new features introduced in WebCGM 2.0. I guess the new features in WebCGM do not impact Web CGM 1.0. Should we also add your statement in the CR exit criteria ? > > > > -- Thierry Michel W3C
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 12:27:09 UTC