- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 20:24:00 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: Benoit Bezaire <benoit@itedo.com>, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton Yes I agree this statement would be valuable. Henderson wrote: > > It would be easy enough to resolve the comment with a new sentence to > begin the Abstract, something like: "WebCGM is a graphics standard > optimized for Web applications in technical electronic documents, > geophysical data visualization, and similar fields." And lightly edit > the current first paragraph of the Abstract to make it flow better. > > -Lofton. > > > At 10:56 AM 7/24/2006 -0400, Benoit Bezaire wrote: >> This is a forwarded message >> From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> >> To: public-webcgm@w3.org >> Date: Friday, July 21, 2006, 5:15:53 AM >> Subject: [LC Review] >> >> ===8<==============Original message text=============== >> >> One thing that struck me was how far you have to read before you find out >> what WebCGM actually is. I think that at very least the abstract should >> say what it is. For the uninitiated it is not until section 1.4 that you >> start getting an inkling that it is something to do with 2D graphics. >> >> Steven Pemberton >> >> >> ===8<===========End of original message text=========== >> >> I don't have a strong opinion about this. If Steven would have clicked >> on 'second (errata) release in 2001' found in the Abstract, he would >> have found the information he was looking for. On the other hand, a >> few more lines in the abstract would be easy enough to add. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.comReceived: >> from frink.w3.org [128.30.52.16] by mail.itedo.com with ESMTP >> (SMTPD-8.22) id AB6B0310; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:16:27 -0700 >> Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.50) >> id 1G3r7R-0007dI-Fe >> for public-webcgm-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 >> 09:16:25 +0000 >> Received: from maggie.w3.org ([193.51.208.68]) >> by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) >> id 1G3r7P-0007bh-I3 >> for public-webcgm@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:16:23 +0000 >> Received: from homer.w3.org ([128.30.52.30]) >> by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) >> id 1G3r7I-0001sc-Ct >> for public-webcgm@w3.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:16:18 +0000 >> Received: from acer3010.ins.cwi.nl (homer.w3.org [128.30.52.30]) >> by homer.w3.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362A04F1D8 >> for <public-webcgm@w3.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 05:16:13 -0400 (EDT) >> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:15:53 +0200 >> To: public-webcgm@w3.org >> From: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> >> Organization: CWI/W3C >> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> Message-ID: <op.tc070rolsmjzpq@acer3010.ins.cwi.nl> >> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.00 (Win32) >> Received-SPF: none (maggie.w3.org: domain of steven.pemberton@cwi.nl >> does not designate permitted sender hosts) >> X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 >> X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1G3r7I-0001sc-Ct >> 06158c2ec53366ac68a078605b826a18 >> X-Original-To: public-webcgm@w3.org >> Subject: [LC Review] >> X-Archived-At: >> http://www.w3.org/mid/op.tc070rolsmjzpq@acer3010.ins.cwi.nl >> Resent-From: public-webcgm@w3.org >> X-Mailing-List: <public-webcgm@w3.org> archive/latest/9 >> X-Loop: public-webcgm@w3.org >> Sender: public-webcgm-request@w3.org >> Resent-Sender: public-webcgm-request@w3.org >> Precedence: list >> List-Id: <public-webcgm.w3.org> >> List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/> >> List-Unsubscribe: >> <mailto:public-webcgm-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe> >> Resent-Message-Id: <E1G3r7R-0007dI-Fe@frink.w3.org> >> Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:16:25 +0000 >> X-RCPT-TO: <benoit@itedo.com> >> Status: U >> X-UIDL: 433560421 >> X-IMail-ThreadID: 9b6b042b00000c82 > > > -- Thierry Michel W3C
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 18:24:36 UTC