- From: Cruikshank, David W <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:26:16 -0700
- To: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
I can offer the Boeing bridge...don't have to set up a time, it's available whenever I initiate a meeting. It also has toll-free numbers in most countries. Also can offer Webex if we want Ulrich or Forrest on-line to show something. Only question is "does the hotel switchboard charge for toll-free outgoing calls?" We would need to scare up a speaker phone, in any case. Thx...Dave Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com -----Original Message----- From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 9:31 AM To: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org Subject: dial-in during WebCGM WG meeting? All (esp. Thierry, Dieter, Chris) -- During the WebCGM TC (OASIS) telecon last week, we arranged that the implementors who are in the TC, but not at the WG meeting, would be available for consultation during the meeting. At the least, we would want to be able to connect with Ulrich (Ematek) and Forrest (SDI). It is also conceivable that we would want to communicate with Rob (of Auto-trol, no longer a TC member, but still has a static CGM implementation.) It is typical for W3C meetings to arrange a Zakim bridge for the needed times. Given that Forrest is in Houston (7 hours earlier), such a bridge reservation would be useful in the afternoon, not the morning. Ulrich is located close to Cologne, so time difference is not a determinant for him. (In fact, he said he could make a visit to the meeting.) Question. Does anyone yet have the action item to ask Amy for a bridge for Wed afternoon and Thursday afternoon? If not, should I do it Monday? Second question. Is this the best way to do it, through a Zakim bridge? Especially, it would require us to dial out from the meeting room, through the hotel switchboard, to a long-distance number. We have had a (very!) bad experience with this in the past. Are there any practical alternatives, if we need to talk to more than one outside person at a time? Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Saturday, 12 August 2006 19:28:32 UTC