- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:44:29 -0600
- To: public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
[...PROLOG...the links [2], [3] are OASIS member only...apologies...there is some bizarre problem with the WebCGM TC archives at OASIS, wherein the public access route seems broken...rather than await the fix, I think we should get this AI of mine into the WG queue...I will resend with public links when they are fixed...] PROBLEM: The description of the highlight method on the Picture interface [1] needs clarification. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-webcgm20-20060623/WebCGM20-DOM.html#L5070 BACKGROUND: When the WebCGM TC was developing the Picture-highlight test (which is on FTP but not yet in the distribution), at least two people misunderstood the nature of using highlight to turn on highlighting on a node. In particular, they incorrectly assumed it behaved like a Style Property (SP), and would exhibit the CSS-borrowed inheritance model that applies to SPs. It does not. This was discussed in the CGMO WebCGM TC and a consensus was reached [2], [3]. That clarification needs to be included in the descriptive text of the highlight method, because the behavior is not obvious (especially as regards inheritance or not). An example would help here also. [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cgmo-webcgm/email/archives/200605/msg00101.html [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cgmo-webcgm/email/archives/200607/msg00010.html OTHER highlight() comments: -- a mention of and link to the toNodeList utility method would be nice; -- s/a IRI/an IRI/ Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2006 23:57:40 UTC