Friday, 28 February 2025
Thursday, 27 February 2025
Wednesday, 26 February 2025
- Closed: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256)
- Re: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256)
- Re: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Remove outdated notes about permissions policy on `isUVPAA()` and `getCC()`
- [w3c/webauthn] 425cfa: Remove outdated notes about permissions policy
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
- Re: [webauthn] PublicKeyCredential.getClientCapabilities() - clarify required permission (#2251)
- Re: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256)
- Re: [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256)
- Re: [webauthn] PublicKeyCredential.getClientCapabilities() - clarify required permission (#2251)
- Re: [webauthn] PublicKeyCredential.getClientCapabilities() - clarify required permission (#2251)
- [w3c/webauthn] d0d155: Merge pull request #2261 from w3c/test-vectors-hea...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot]
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [w3c/webauthn] 559de5: Fix test vectors heading levels
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix test vectors heading levels
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [w3c/webauthn] 88620d: Add a missing period
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
- 02/26/2025 W3C Web Authentication Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262)
Tuesday, 25 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262)
- [w3c/webauthn] cc478f: Open the door to more possibilities
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
- [w3c/webauthn] 39960b: Tweak potential use cases
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
- Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
Monday, 24 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- [w3c/webauthn] d114e6: Merge pull request #2265 from w3c/timcappalli-patch-3
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot]
- [w3c/webauthn] d7a03d: chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
Sunday, 23 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Wide Review (#2248)
- Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Wide Review (#2248)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template (#2265)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
Saturday, 22 February 2025
- [webauthn] Can we document protections (if any) around userHandle (with user-verification)? (#2266)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
Friday, 21 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] [Editorial] Truncation description inaccurate (#1645)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template
- [w3c/webauthn] d7a03d: chore: try 3 for fixing the issue template
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
- [w3c/webauthn] 2bf7ed: Merge pull request #2264 from w3c/timcappalli-patch-2
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot]
- [w3c/webauthn] 7eff86: chore: Fix issue template contact links
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: chore: Fix issue template contact links
- Re: [webauthn] chore: Fix issue template contact links (#2264)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: chore: Fix issue template contact links
- [w3c/webauthn] 7eff86: chore: Fix issue template contact links
- [w3c/webauthn]
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli
- Re: [webauthn] chore: Update issue template (#2242)
- Re: [webauthn] [Editorial] Truncation description inaccurate (#1645)
- Re: [webauthn] supplementalPubKeys attestation incompatible with most verification procedures (#2075)
- Closed: [webauthn] supplementalPubKeys attestation incompatible with most verification procedures (#2075)
- Re: [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Closed: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- [webauthn] Give each authenticator a GUID and add an option to CredentialsContainer: create method to return this GUID if user permits (#2263)
- Re: [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262)
Thursday, 20 February 2025
- [webauthn] Find out whether passkeys are supported without passing value to publicKey parameter in .get() (#2262)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix test vectors heading levels
- [w3c/webauthn] 559de5: Fix test vectors heading levels
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
Wednesday, 19 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Potential WebAuthn F2F/hybrid meeting on 4/11
- Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Closed: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255)
- Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn available to Workers? aka "silent authentication" (#199)
- Closed: [webauthn] WebAuthn available to Workers? aka "silent authentication" (#199)
- Closed: [webauthn] Support for PWA authenticators (#1514)
- Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: TAG Design Reviews (#2247)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a new optional `rpId` to Credential Record (#2258)
- Re: [webauthn] Prepare for CR (#2225)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2252)
- Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Accessibility (#2246)
- Re: [webauthn] Prepare for CR (#2225)
- Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Implementation Requirements (#2249)
- Closed: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Implementation Requirements (#2249)
- Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Internationalization (i18n) (#2245)
- [webauthn] [L3 CR] Internationalization Self-Review (#2260)
- 02/19/2025 W3C Web Authentication Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, 18 February 2025
Wednesday, 12 February 2025
- [w3c/webauthn] 5b55cd: Merge pull request #2254 from tabatkins/patch-1
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot]
- [w3c/webauthn] 89ba88: Handle Bikeshed 5.0.3
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Handle Bikeshed 5.0.3
- Re: [webauthn] [L3 CR] Horizontal Review: Security & Privacy (#2244)
- Re: [webauthn] Update Credential Record to suggest storing RP ID as well for better Related Origins support (#2257)
- Re: [webauthn] Update Credential Record to suggest storing RP ID as well for better Related Origins support (#2257)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup preference for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2253)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup preference for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2253)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Backup Preference Option for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential
- Re: [webauthn] Add a new optional `rpId` to Credential Record (#2258)
- Re: [webauthn] Update Credential Record to suggest storing RP ID as well for better Related Origins support (#2257)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Add a new optional `rpId` to Credential Record
- [w3c/webauthn] 831ec2: Define new `rpId` in Credential Record
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale
Tuesday, 11 February 2025
- Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
- 02/12/2025 W3C Web Authentication Meeting Agenda
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
Monday, 10 February 2025
- [webauthn] Update Credential Record to suggest storing RP ID as well for better Related Origins support (#2257)
- Re: [webauthn] Missing tasks in parallel steps in Web Authentication: An API for accessing Public Key Credentials - Level 3 (#2250)
- [webauthn] User friendly credential ID string for troubleshooting (#2256)
Sunday, 9 February 2025
Saturday, 8 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
Friday, 7 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Closed: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
Thursday, 6 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- [webauthn] Provide a method to get the count of the credentials of a rely party on client device on user permission (#2255)
- Re: [webauthn] Synced/multi-device user Credentials (#1665)
- Closed: [webauthn] Synced/multi-device user Credentials (#1665)
Wednesday, 5 February 2025
Tuesday, 4 February 2025
Monday, 3 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Backup preference for providers who support both backed-up and non-backed up credential (#2253)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration (#2252)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration (#2252)
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Backup preference
- [webauthn] Provide a way for an RP to indicate backup preference during credential registration (#2252)
Saturday, 1 February 2025
- Re: [webauthn] Add a method to get the count of the credentials for a rely party on the client device to support the rely party (website) to limit the number of accounts a user can register (#2222)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a method to get the count of the credentials for a rely party on the client device to support the rely party (website) to limit the number of accounts a user can register (#2222)
- Re: [webauthn] Add a method to get the count of the credentials for a rely party on the client device to support the rely party (website) to limit the number of accounts a user can register (#2222)