Re: [webauthn] Minor cleanups from PR 1270 review (#1291)

> > * [#1270 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1270#discussion_r320890970)
> > 
> > > @equalsJeffH: I wonder about this term "first-factor" and whether we ought to really be using "multi-factor" instead...
> 
> This one I think might still be relevant. "Multi-factor" would technically be more accurate, but on the other hand "first-factor" highlights that it can be used as the first step of an authentication procedure. I'm not sure if there's one that's clearly "better" than the other.

This was recently obsoleted by #2140 and #2138. I still think the other points are unnecessary as described above. I think we can close this issue.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by emlun
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1291#issuecomment-2372446307 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2024 21:46:31 UTC