- From: Emil Lundberg via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:46:03 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
I'll keep #2082 open because layout consistency is good for readability even when not formally required. > Is there any recommendation at all on the order of fields? For how RPs should order fields in JavaScript representations of the options objects: no, order should not matter at all. The low-level [CTAP protocol does care about serialization order](https://fidoalliance.org/specs/fido-v2.1-ps-20210615/fido-client-to-authenticator-protocol-v2.1-ps-20210615.html#ctap2-canonical-cbor-encoding-form), but that's a different protocol which is not exposed to web applications and is not defined in WebIDL. -- GitHub Notification of comment by emlun Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/2083#issuecomment-2165292108 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2024 10:46:04 UTC