- From: Nina Satragno via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:59:40 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
During the call, we decided: Let's state that the RFC only applies for non-empty values. This prevents us from breaking backwards compatibility, removes the contradiction, and keeps the value from specifying how the display name should be chosen. The issue discussed during the call of compatibility issues due to empty display names is orthogonal, and likely an implementation issue. If we tried to fix it by making it optional, we'd risk the much worse compatibility risk of clients that haven't updated breaking. We'll figure out if there are any spec bugs leading to that offline with @MasterKale. (this discussion was long, and I might have missed something worth summarizing, feel free to chime in!) @selfissued said he'd be happy to update this PR to match. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nsatragno Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/2073#issuecomment-2163800003 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2024 19:59:41 UTC