public-webauthn@w3.org from February 2024 by author

Adam Langley

• Re: Venue for potential face-to-face meeting on 2024-04-19 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Venue for potential face-to-face meeting on 2024-04-19 (Thursday, 29 February)

Adam Langley via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Defining new OIDs to facilitate WebAuthn interoperability with CMS (#2026) (Wednesday, 28 February)

Anders Åberg

• [w3c/webauthn] 28b6a9: Updated Tim (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0e834a: Adding Anders as contributor (Wednesday, 28 February)

Anders Åberg via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] New Authenticator Extension: Time Since UV (#2034) (Thursday, 29 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by abergs (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Adding Anders as contributor (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by abergs (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding flexibility in client origin scheme validation to align with real world implementations (#2018) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding flexibility in client origin scheme validation to align with real world implementations (#2018) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding flexibility in client origin scheme validation to align with real world implementations (#2018) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Barry Pederson via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Adding flexibility in client origin scheme validation to align with real world implementations (#2018) (Thursday, 15 February)

DannyNiu/NJF via GitHub

• [webauthn] Numbering in the step needs update in 7.1. Registering a New Credential (#2030) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Section 13.1 makes confusing statement saying `CredentialID` is unsigned, where it's actually signed in some cases. (#2028) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Section 13.1 makes confusing statement saying `CredentialID` is unsigned, where it's actually signed in some cases. (#2028) (Wednesday, 28 February)

David Waite via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Add packed attestation optional firmware version attribute (#1953) (Wednesday, 21 February)

Dimitri Bouniol via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Invoking the authenticatorMakeCredential operation clarification (#2025) (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] Invoking the authenticatorMakeCredential operation clarification (#2025) (Friday, 16 February)

Emil Lundberg

• [w3c/webauthn] 84566f: Merge pull request #2029 from w3c/issue-2028-crede... (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] fdfeb0: Precisize that it's assertions that don't sign the... (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] cbe26a: Fix out-of-sync numbers in algorithm step references (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 70981d: Clarify connection between credential record and P... (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] f337fc: Address review comments (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] e95ad5: Address review comments (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] fdfeb0: Precisize that it's assertions that don't sign the... (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 84f280: Merge pull request #2027 from w3c/issue-2025-invok... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] e239ee: Fix indentation of step to invoke authenticatorMak... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] e239ee: Fix indentation of step to invoke authenticatorMak... (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 288dea: Fix indentation of step to invoke authenticatorMak... (Friday, 16 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 2a024a: Merge pull request #2014 from w3c/tokenbinding-ref (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 281408: Fix references to reserved tokenBinding member (Wednesday, 14 February)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

• Closed: [webauthn] Make user.displayName optional? (#2024) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Section 13.1 makes confusing statement saying `CredentialID` is unsigned, where it's actually signed in some cases. (#2028) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Precisize that it's assertions that don't sign the credential ID (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Numbering in the step needs update in 7.1. Registering a New Credential (#2030) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix out-of-sync numbers in algorithm step references (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Clarify connection between credential record and PublicKeyCredentialDescriptor (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Section 13.1 makes confusing statement saying `CredentialID` is unsigned, where it's actually signed in some cases. (#2028) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Precisize that it's assertions that don't sign the credential ID (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Adding flexibility in client origin scheme validation to align with real world implementations (#2018) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix indentation of step to invoke authenticatorMakeCredential (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Closed: [webauthn] Invoking the authenticatorMakeCredential operation clarification (#2025) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Invoking the authenticatorMakeCredential operation clarification (#2025) (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix indentation of step to invoke authenticatorMakeCredential (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Friday, 16 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Fix references to reserved tokenBinding member (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Make user.displayName optional? (#2024) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] Make user.displayName optional? (#2024) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Monday, 12 February)

Felix Magedanz via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Improved version of extension for Transaction Confirmation (#2020) (Thursday, 29 February)

Firstyear via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Reflect caching of user gestures in WebAuthn assertion (#2023) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Reflect caching of user gestures in WebAuthn assertion (#2023) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Reflect caching of user gestures in WebAuthn assertion (#2023) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Wednesday, 14 February)

github-actions[bot] via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 14 February)

John Bradley via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Reflect caching of user gestures in WebAuthn assertion (#2023) (Wednesday, 28 February)

John Schanck via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] New Authenticator Extension: Time Since UV (#2034) (Wednesday, 28 February)

Mathieu Perreault via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Non-modal registration during conditional assertion (#1929) (Thursday, 22 February)

Matthew Miller via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Make user.displayName optional? (#2024) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] New Authenticator Extension: Time Since UV (#2034) (Wednesday, 28 February)

Michael Jones

• RE: Venue for potential face-to-face meeting on 2024-04-19 (Thursday, 29 February)

nadalin@prodigy.net

• 02/28/2024 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Tuesday, 27 February)
• 02/21/2024 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Wednesday, 21 February)
• 02/14/2024 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Wednesday, 14 February)
• 02/14/2024 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Wednesday, 14 February)
• 02/07/2024 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Tuesday, 6 February)

Nick Steele

• [w3c/webauthn] 834f5a: Merge pull request #2019 from abergs/localhost-con... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 8775f0: Added example of valid origin based on secure context (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] f42f4b: Merge pull request #2018 from abergs/non-https-loo... (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 2a653d: Added a loophole for secure contexts not using https (Wednesday, 21 February)

Nick Steele via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Adding example of localhost as allowed host/origin (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Adding flexibility in client origin scheme validation to align with real world implementations (Wednesday, 21 February)

Pascoe via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Non-modal registration during conditional assertion (#1929) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Initial text for conditional create (#1951) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Initial text for conditional create (#1951) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Philippe Le Hégaret

• Draft Charter for next 2 years (Tuesday, 20 February)

r-jo via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) (Sunday, 11 February)

Ricardo Iván Vieitez Parra via GitHub

• [webauthn] Defining new OIDs to facilitate WebAuthn interoperability with CMS (#2026) (Friday, 16 February)

Rolf Lindemann

• [w3c/webauthn] 89c99a: removed more whitespaces (Thursday, 29 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] aa177a: added suggested changes (Thursday, 29 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 891f45: more clarifications (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 030bb9: removed TODOs (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] 3fc2a0: user verification caching etension added - to mode... (Monday, 12 February)
• [w3c/webauthn] c3a701: rename to txAuthSimple (Monday, 12 February)

Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Support a "create or get [or replace]" credential re-association operation (#1568) (Thursday, 29 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Thursday, 29 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Improved version of extension for Transaction Confirmation (#2020) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [webauthn] user verification caching extension added (#2021) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] user verification caching extension added (#2021) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] Reflect caching of user gestures in WebAuthn assertion (#2023) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Improved version of extension for Transaction Confirmation (#2020) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Revised txAuthSimple extension (#2022) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [webauthn] Revised txAuthSimple extension (#2022) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [webauthn] user verification caching etension added (#2021) (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: user verification caching etension added (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Monday, 12 February)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by rlin1 (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Improved version of extension for Transaction Confirmation (#2020) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Improved version of extension for Transaction Confirmation (Thursday, 8 February)

SHANE WEEDEN

• Re: [webauthn] Reflect caching of user gestures in WebAuthn assertion (#2023) (Thursday, 29 February)

Shane Weeden via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Reflect caching of user gestures in WebAuthn assertion (#2023) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [webauthn] New Authenticator Extension: Time Since UV (#2034) (Wednesday, 28 February)

Tim Cappalli

• Re: Poll for WebAuthn F2F date (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Poll for WebAuthn F2F date (Monday, 5 February)

Tim Cappalli via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] New Authenticator Extension: Time Since UV (#2034) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] Improved version of extension for Transaction Confirmation (#2020) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [webauthn] New Authenticator Extension: Time Since UV (#2034) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [webauthn] user verification caching etension added (#2021) (Monday, 12 February)

W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 29 February 2024 22:42:25 UTC