- From: Firstyear via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:52:07 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
> There is consensus in the FIDO Alliance. The agreed-upon definition there (see https://fidoalliance.org/passkeys/#faq) is that a **passkey** is a _discoverable FIDO credential_, without further qualification: > Given that there have been comments in this thread like https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1901#issuecomment-1583847785 it's hard to say that the FIDO alliance definition is being found and understood, especially going back to the fact that businesses are already deploying 'passkeys` using a variety of self-chosen definitions to what they are. I'm extremely against passkey as a term being introduced to this specification. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Firstyear Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1901#issuecomment-1593818016 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2023 22:52:09 UTC