Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939)

And to reiterate, adding the "passkey" alias to "discoverable credentials" allows us to offer nicer developer experiences in APIs like `isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable()` (#1901), soon to be replaced by the highly-demanded `getClientCapabilities()` (#1923). Methods like these offer developers **memorable** method names and return values to streamline things for developers, which ultimately raise adoption rates.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by MasterKale
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1939#issuecomment-1668793584 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2023 01:52:31 UTC