public-webauthn@w3.org from August 2023 by date

Thursday, 31 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] [[preventSilentAccess]] seems incorrect (#1956) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] [[preventSilentAccess]] seems incorrect (#1956) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 235ab6: Pluralize implementations Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Broken references in Web Authentication: An API for accessing Public Key Credentials - Level (#1794) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix broken spec references Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f6bbe7: Remove outdated spec reference anchors Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Wednesday, 30 August 2023

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Enterprise packed attestation guidance David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Allow conditional and modal flows to run simultaneously (#1854) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how to differentiate between exceptions (#1859) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should enterprise attestation support be flagged explicitly? (#1742) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Enforce backup eligibility during assertion (#1791) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Dependencies section is out of date and duplicates terms index (#1797) Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Spec abstract is out of date on the eve of multi-device credentials and cross-device auth (#1743) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add packed attestation optional firmware version attribute David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Broken references in Web Authentication: An API for accessing Public Key Credentials - Level (#1794) Anthony Nadalin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify the need for truly randomly generated challenges (aka challenge callback issue) (#1856) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add packed attestation optional firmware version attribute (#1953) David Waite via GitHub
• [webauthn] Describe `firmware` OID usage in packed attestation (#1952) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Juan C. Andreu via GitHub
• 08/30/2023 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net

Tuesday, 29 August 2023

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Initial text for conditional create Pascoe via GitHub
• Event Canceled: Web Authentication weekly Anthony Nadalin (W3C Calendar)
• Re: [webauthn] Add `compound` attestation format (#1950) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add `compound` attestation format (#1950) Andrey Paramonov via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add `compound` attestation format Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ae0786: rogue text change Tim Cappalli
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 11429c: initial text for compound attestation format Tim Cappalli
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Saturday, 26 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] The default value of `attestation` member in `PublicKeyCredentialRequestOptions` should be null or must not have default value (#1941) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Friday, 25 August 2023

• [w3c/webauthn] 4b017b: Merge pull request #1884 from w3c/hints Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Adam Langley
• [w3c/webauthn] ef8630: Add a `hints` element for both `create` and `get`. Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add a `hints` element for both `create` and `get`. Adam Langley via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] bda342: Merge pull request #1 from w3c/master Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub

Thursday, 24 August 2023

• [w3c/webauthn] 7068cf: Streamline user.name definition and add examples Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 6b9a84: Suggest empty string for displayName when needed Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] The default value of `attestation` member in `PublicKeyCredentialRequestOptions` should be null or must not have default value (#1941) John Bradley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn available to Workers? aka "silent authentication" (#199) Jordan Sexton via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] WebAuthn available to Workers? aka "silent authentication" (#199) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] The default value of `attestation` member in `PublicKeyCredentialRequestOptions` should be null or must not have default value (#1941) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Proposal/discussion: non-extractable CryptoKey output from the prf extension (#1895) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix inconsistent usage of options variable Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Wednesday, 23 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistent variable reference of attestation and attestationFormats in the steps (#1947) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• [webauthn] Inconsistent variable reference of attestation and attestationFormats in the steps (#1947) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] The default value of `attestation` member in `PublicKeyCredentialRequestOptions` should be null or must not have default value (#1941) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add authenticatorDisplayName to credProps (#1880) Arnar Birgisson via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] b72ecc: Use {{KeyFormat/raw}} Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Allow desired attestation format to be an ordered list (#1917) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: [Meta] Hard-code HKDF in PRF importCryptoKey Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add importCryptoKey input to PRF extension Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c45533: Hard-code HKDF in PRF importCryptoKey Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Delete outdated note about checking registration UV with PRF extension Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 7b877b: Delete outdated note about checking registration U... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Tuesday, 22 August 2023

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Monday, 21 August 2023

• 08/23/2023 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net

Saturday, 19 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) Arian van Putten via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] username and display name should not be mandatory (rp, challange either) and OS UX should be simplified if not present (#1915) Ryan Shahine via GitHub
• [webauthn] make username fields optional (do not delete them, but do not force their usage, either, which is hostile against usernameless services) (#1942) r-jo via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] username and display name should not be mandatory (rp, challange either) and OS UX should be simplified if not present (#1915) r-jo via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] username and display name should not be mandatory (rp, challange either) and OS UX should be simplified if not present (#1915) r-jo via GitHub

Friday, 18 August 2023

• Closed: [webauthn] Add Changed Flag to UVM Entry (#1890) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add Changed Flag to UVM Entry (#1890) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] username and display name should not be mandatory (rp, challange either) and OS UX should be simplified if not present (#1915) r-jo via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] username and display name should not be mandatory (rp, challange either) and OS UX should be simplified if not present (#1915) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] username and display name should not be mandatory (rp, challange either) and OS UX should be simplified if not present (#1915) r-jo via GitHub
• [webauthn] The default value of `attestation` member in `PublicKeyCredentialRequestOptions` should be null (#1941) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add authenticatorDisplayName to credProps (#1880) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Thursday, 17 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] Adding some sentences to describe credential sharing between multiple users (#1921) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Adding some sentences to describe credential sharing between multiple users (#1921) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Adding some sentences to describe credential sharing between multiple users (#1921) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Wednesday, 16 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] Adding some sentences to describe credential sharing between multiple users (#1921) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Signaling when user credentials are shared between users to the `relying party` (#1922) Firstyear via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] username and display name should not be mandatory (rp, challange either) and OS UX should be simplified if not present (#1915) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] username and display name should not be mandatory (rp, challange either) and OS UX should be simplified if not present (#1915) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Return public key in attestedCredentialData on authenticatorGetAssertion (#1928) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Return public key in attestedCredentialData on authenticatorGetAssertion (#1928) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Signaling when user credentials are shared between users to the `relying party` (#1922) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Signaling when user credentials are shared between users to the `relying party` (#1922) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Proposal/discussion: non-extractable CryptoKey output from the prf extension (#1895) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Non-modal registration during conditional assertion (#1929) Pascoe via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Address description of uses, and requirements for supplying userHandle (#1914) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 3cc3a8: Merge pull request #1914 from sbweeden/sbweeden_18... Nick Steele
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add a `hints` element for both `create` and `get`. (#1884) Adam Langley via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 0553e3: Explicitly require userHandle to be supplied durin... Nick Steele
• Closed: [webauthn] Require non-null userHandle when allowCredentials is empty? (#1892) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Revisit description of userHandle (#1909) Nick Steele via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele Nick Steele via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Address description of uses, and requirements for supplying userHandle Nick Steele via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 8f0e23: Merge pull request #1920 from Kieun/kieun-1918 Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] bda342: Merge pull request #1 from w3c/master Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] `attestation` and `attestationObject` is missing some of interfaces for assertions (#1918) Adam Langley via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add missing fields in dictionaries for JSON representation Adam Langley via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 86dbab: Merge pull request #1930 from w3c/issue-1889-clari... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 783d71: Merge pull request #1931 from w3c/nsteele-authntct... Nick Steele
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] 913576: Add security consideration section "Validating the... Emil Lundberg
• Closed: [webauthn] Clarify how the given origin in the ClientDataJSON matches to the expected one (#1889) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Add security consideration section "Validating the origin of a credential" Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 104733: Update Authenticator definition Nick Steele
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele Nick Steele via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Update Authenticator Definition Nick Steele via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] eaa922: Apply emlun's suggestion. Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Adding some sentences to describe credential sharing between multiple users (#1921) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• 08/16/2023 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net
• Event Invitation: Web Authentication weekly Anthony Nadalin (W3C Calendar)

Tuesday, 15 August 2023

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 03937f: Try to tweak wording to emphasize name Matthew Miller
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Monday, 14 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] Non-modal registration during conditional assertion (#1929) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Adding some sentences to describe credential sharing between multiple users (#1921) Firstyear via GitHub

Wednesday, 9 August 2023

• [w3c/webauthn] Tim Cappalli
• [w3c/webauthn] 730716: remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable Tim Cappalli
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() (#1936) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 4cc067: add getClientCapabilites method and enum Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] 7b1099: Disambiguate [=Window=] links as {{Window}} Emil Lundberg
• Closed: [webauthn] Ambiguous reference to [=Window=] (#1910) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Disambiguate [=Window=] links as {{Window}} Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() (#1936) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) James Elliott via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 7dce3c: Merge pull request #1907 from w3c/1791-enforce-be-... Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Matthew Miller
• [w3c/webauthn] 615e8e: Assert that be:0+bs:1 is bad during create() Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Define RP processing of be and bs flags during `.create()` and `.get()` Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Event Updated: Web Authentication bi-weekly Anthony Nadalin (W3C Calendar)
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Max Hata via GitHub
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: remove passkey word Kosuke Koiwai via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Kosuke Koiwai via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Nov Matake via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Extension's data security on assertion (#1940) Nikita Semenov via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Extension's data security on assertion (#1940) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Nov Matake via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Max Hata via GitHub
• [webauthn] Extension's data security on assertion (#1940) Nikita Semenov via GitHub
• 08/09/2023 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net

Tuesday, 8 August 2023

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [webauthn] Should we keep the word “passkey” in the spec or not (#1939) Kosuke Koiwai via GitHub

Monday, 7 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] Adding some sentences to describe credential sharing between multiple users (#1921) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Kosuke Koiwai via GitHub

Sunday, 6 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Firstyear via GitHub

Saturday, 5 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Max Hata via GitHub

Friday, 4 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove passkey word (#1938) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: remove passkey word Kosuke Koiwai via GitHub

Wednesday, 2 August 2023

• [w3c/webauthn] ea2241: Fix line length for `name` Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add new getClientCapabilities method (#1923) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] baa930: s/ClientCapability/ClientCapabilities Tim Cappalli
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() (#1936) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() (#1936) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() (#1936) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() (#1936) Max Hata via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() (#1936) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() (#1936) Kosuke Koiwai via GitHub

Tuesday, 1 August 2023

• Re: [webauthn] Remove isPPAA() and expand getClientCapabilities() (#1937) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add new getClientCapabilities method (#1923) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [webauthn] Remove isPPAA() and expand getClientCapabilities() (#1937) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable() Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 730716: remove isPasskeyPlatformAuthenticatorAvailable Tim Cappalli
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 6931da: change to dict and add new values Tim Cappalli
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by timcappalli Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c24ac1: Trim line length Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f09e3d: Clarify that displayName can be the same as name Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Add new getClientCapabilities method (#1923) Arian van Putten via GitHub

Last message date: Thursday, 31 August 2023 12:43:02 UTC