public-webauthn@w3.org from May 2022 by date

Tuesday, 31 May 2022

• Re: 06/01/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting Ian Jacobs
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• 06/01/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net
• Event Updated: WebAuthn F2F at RSA 2022 W3C Calendar

Monday, 30 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Sunday, 29 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Mention constant-zero case in §6.1.1 Signature Counter Considerations (#1736) Ackermann Yuriy via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 743802: Make a normative-looking "may" actually normative ... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Mention constant-zero signature counter in §6.1.1 Signature Counter Considerations Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f9ccf4: Mention constant-zero signature counter in §6.1.1 ... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Saturday, 28 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Provide passwordless example, or update 1.3.2. to be a passwordless example (#1735) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Provide passwordless example, or update 1.3.2. to be a passwordless example (#1735) AlbertEinstein via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Matthew Miller via GitHub

Friday, 27 May 2022

• [webauthn] Provide passwordless example, or update 1.3.2. to be a passwordless example (#1735) Greg Brimble via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Anders Rundgren via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Thursday, 26 May 2022

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add "Code injection attacks" security consideration Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] d388f9: Add security consideration: Code injection attacks Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] df052b: Add security consideration: Code injection attacks Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 4442cb: Narrow claim about MitM resistance to tampering sp... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Tuesday, 24 May 2022

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Friday, 20 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Portability of private keys (#865) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Portability of private keys (#865) Afolabi Aiyeloja via GitHub

Thursday, 19 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663) W3C Bot via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663) W3C Bot via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ccfd0b: Resolve comment by jovasco Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] d92bad: The DPK is stored on the authenticator. Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Readd the PRF extension. (#1732) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Readd the PRF extension. (#1732) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Readd the PRF extension. (#1732) Nuno Sung via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Wednesday, 18 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Readd the PRF extension. (#1732) Firstyear via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Readd the PRF extension. Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731) Firstyear via GitHub
• Event Canceled: WebAuthn WG - canceled after F2F W3C Calendar
• Closed: [webauthn] Unclear/underspecified signature formats (#1721) Akshay Kumar via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Can userHandle be an empty string? (#1722) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Can userHandle be an empty string? (#1722) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 307c29: Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706) Nidhi Jaju
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 0678b0: Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706) Nidhi Jaju
• Re: [webauthn] Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nsatragno Nina Satragno via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Updates based on DOM's abort reason Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Fix the "aborted flag" reference (#1682) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• 05/18/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net

Tuesday, 17 May 2022

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Updates based on DOM's abort reason (#1706) Nidhi Jaju via GitHub

Monday, 16 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Silvan Mosberger via GitHub

Thursday, 12 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validations when calling credentials.get() from a different origin (#1731) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Firstyear via GitHub

Wednesday, 11 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] Missing specification on rpId validation when invoking the API from 3rd party origin (#1731) SMD2 via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Nick Steele via GitHub

Tuesday, 10 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) John Bradley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Support for remote desktops (#1577) John Bradley
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Make Jeff Hodges a former editor. (#1724) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Monday, 9 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Support for remote desktops (#1577) seism0saurus via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Friday, 6 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Support for remote desktops (#1577) Thomas Duboucher via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Firstyear via GitHub

Thursday, 5 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Unclear/underspecified signature formats (#1721) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Can userHandle be an empty string? (#1722) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Mark Fulton via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Support for remote desktops (#1577) seism0saurus via GitHub

Wednesday, 4 May 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Mark Fulton via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 939e8d: Make Jeff Hodges a former editor. (#1724) Jeffrey Yasskin
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Make Jeff Hodges a former editor. (#1724) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] d30a94: Make Jeff Hodges a former editor. (#1724) Jeffrey Yasskin
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nsatragno Nina Satragno via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Make Jeff Hodges a former editor. Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Mark Fulton via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Authentication through only what you are (#1728) Mark Fulton via GitHub

Tuesday, 3 May 2022

• 05/04/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2022 21:05:06 UTC