public-webauthn@w3.org from June 2022 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Nuno Sung via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) Lucas Garron via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Firstyear via GitHub

Wednesday, 29 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 91473c: Non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) =JeffH
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 8ad944: Non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) =JeffH
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Add support for non-modal UI (#1545) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nsatragno Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) Wendy Seltzer via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] e106da: Merge pull request #1703 from w3c/masterkale-1683-... Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Matthew Miller
• [w3c/webauthn] 59ecbf: Add sections for new API methods Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Anders Rundgren via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Use aPAKE/OPAQUE for FIDO multi-device credentials (PassKey) (#1747) Sebastian Elfors (IDnow) via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Andrey Paramonov via GitHub
• 06/29/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting nadalin@prodigy.net

Tuesday, 28 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) James Elliott via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Use aPAKE/OPAQUE for FIDO multi-device credentials (PassKey) (#1747) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Andrey Paramonov via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Ackermann Yuriy
• [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 74eb1b: Address review comments Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

Monday, 27 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Felix Magedanz via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Marco Martins via GitHub

Sunday, 26 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Andrey Paramonov via GitHub

Saturday, 25 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub

Friday, 24 June 2022

• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add "hybrid" as a transport. Adam Langley via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 656e61: Add "hybrid" as a transport. Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Daniel Nagy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Felix Magedanz via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Daniel Nagy via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) AadaEa via GitHub

Thursday, 23 June 2022

• Re: [w3c/webauthn] Wendy Seltzer
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) James Elliott via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) lkj4 via GitHub

Wednesday, 22 June 2022

• Re: [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] 27d089: Introduce unsigned extension outputs and use it to... Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (#1753) Arnar Birgisson via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (#1753) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR Arnar Birgisson via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (#1753) Arnar Birgisson via GitHub
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR Arnar Birgisson via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR Arnar Birgisson via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 750efd: Use "public key credential source" consistently Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 67f1df: Order Terminology definitions alphabetically Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 4cd4ed: Remove extraneous brackets Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) Firstyear via GitHub

Tuesday, 21 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Spec abstract is out of date on the eve of multi-device credentials and cross-device auth (#1743) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Better specify what an unknown type credential descriptor being ignored means (#1748) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• [webauthn] Incorrect use of _options_ variable in `create()` and `get()` definitions (#1752) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Matthew Miller via GitHub

Monday, 20 June 2022

• [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) Diego García via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) Diego García via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 12e507: Incorporate feedback on wording for exceptions Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Better specify what an unknown type credential descriptor being ignored means (#1748) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Better specify what an unknown type credential descriptor being ignored means (#1748) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Firstyear via GitHub

Sunday, 19 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) David Waite via GitHub
• [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub

Saturday, 18 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub

Friday, 17 June 2022

• [w3c/webauthn] 36c7f9: Change "create any credentials" to "create any ass... Adam Langley
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl Adam Langley via GitHub
• [webauthn] Better specify what an unknown type credential descriptor being ignored means (#1748) Nina Satragno via GitHub

Thursday, 16 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

Wednesday, 15 June 2022

• 06/15/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting CANCELLED nadalin@prodigy.net
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• [webauthn] Use aPAKE/QPAQUE for FIDO multi-device credentials (PassKey) (#1747) Sebastian Elfors (IDnow) via GitHub

Tuesday, 14 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) John Bradley
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Rolf Lindemann via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Firstyear via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] c62b77: Use [RP] and [WRP] macros Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Monday, 13 June 2022

• [w3c/webauthn] 684cd9: Use [RP] and [WRP] macros Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix some editorial issues Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] a376e3: Fix trailing whitespace Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Silvan Mosberger via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Firstyear via GitHub

Friday, 10 June 2022

• [webauthn] Conditional Mediation feature discovery should really return a promise (#1745) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 88bd8f: Attempt to define rules for when encoding fails Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) David Waite via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] b1b5fd: Incorporate @emlun's copy advice Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] DRAFT: Backup eligibility parameter during registration (#1744) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] DRAFT: Backup eligibility parameter during registration (#1744) Shane Weeden via GitHub

Thursday, 9 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: DRAFT: Backup eligibility parameter during registration Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f6db88: Add draft of backup eligibility parameter during r... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Spec abstract is out of date on the eve of multi-device credentials and cross-device auth (#1743) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation on Get Assertion (#1741) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation on Get Assertion (#1741) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• [webauthn] Should enterprise attestation support be flagged explicitly? (#1742) Nina Satragno via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) Mike Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation on Get Assertion (#1741) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] e42a23: Merge pull request #1736 from w3c/issue-1734-sign-... Emil Lundberg
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Emil Lundberg
• [w3c/webauthn] f9ccf4: Mention constant-zero signature counter in §6.1.1 ... Emil Lundberg
• Closed: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Mention constant-zero case in §6.1.1 Signature Counter Considerations Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] ae3a7d: Rename options methods from `get-` to `parse-` Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 582b2e: Incorporate Emil's feedback Matthew Miller
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] Attestation on Get Assertion (#1741) Tim Cappalli via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] 3dbff5: Merge pull request #1695 from w3c/timcappalli-1692... Nick Steele
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Nick Steele
• [w3c/webauthn] 0c7405: #1692 backup states in authenticator data Nick Steele
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: backup states in authenticator data Nick Steele via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele Nick Steele via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) Adam Langley via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) Matthew Miller via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) Mike Jones via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) John Bradley via GitHub

Wednesday, 8 June 2022

• Event Updated: WebAuthn WG W3C Calendar
• Event Invitation: WebAuthn WG W3C Calendar
• [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) Nina Satragno via GitHub

Tuesday, 7 June 2022

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Chad Killingsworth via GitHub

Monday, 6 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) James Elliott via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Chad Killingsworth via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Chad Killingsworth via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Chad Killingsworth via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Shane Weeden via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) Chad Killingsworth via GitHub

Thursday, 2 June 2022

• [w3c/webauthn] f2fb63: Merge pull request #1737 from w3c/remove-generic-p... Nick Steele
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] Nick Steele
• [w3c/webauthn] f1f8b5: Remove Generic Passthrough Operations Nick Steele
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Remove Generic Passthrough Nick Steele via GitHub
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Read the PRF extension. (#1732) Lucas Garron via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) Emil Lundberg via GitHub

Wednesday, 1 June 2022

• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) Firstyear via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Refer to options for the user verification check Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709) Emil Lundberg via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Process to report non-compliant credentials (#1713) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] Process to report non-compliant credentials (#1713) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Closed: [webauthn] caBLE for Payments (#1681) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] caBLE for Payments (#1681) Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] Read the PRF extension. (#1732) Adam Langley via GitHub
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Remove Generic Passthrough Nick Steele via GitHub
• [w3c/webauthn] f1f8b5: Remove Generic Passthrough Operations Nick Steele
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele Nick Steele via GitHub
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) Matthew Miller via GitHub

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2022 12:21:44 UTC