Thursday, 27 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
Wednesday, 26 January 2022
- Closed: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Akshay timeouts
- [w3c/webauthn] 112bfe: Merge pull request #1693 from w3c/issue-1687-crede...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot]
- [w3c/webauthn] 36c7f9: Change "create any credentials" to "create any ass...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Change "create any credentials" to "create any assertions" in get() description
- Closed: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- 01/26/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting
Tuesday, 25 January 2022
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Change "create any credentials" to "create any assertions" in get() description
- [w3c/webauthn] 36c7f9: Change "create any credentials" to "create any ass...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692)
- Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665)
- Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665)
- Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
- Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665)
- Re: [webauthn] Synced Credentials (#1665)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] Device-bound key extension (#1658)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if multi-device WebAuthn credentials are used (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] Device-bound key extension (#1658)
Monday, 24 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devicePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
Sunday, 23 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
Saturday, 22 January 2022
Friday, 21 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
Thursday, 20 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- [webauthn] devciePubKey extension MUST be supported if passkey is supported (#1691)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
Wednesday, 19 January 2022
Tuesday, 18 January 2022
- [w3c/webauthn] f131d6: remove extraneous Note on permissions policy that ...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Re: [webauthn] device public key extension (#1663)
- [w3c/webauthn] 55e64c: revise intro and define most of verification proce...
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn] c3be90: Fix lowercase start of a sentence
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
Sunday, 16 January 2022
- [webauthn] Pull Request: Akshay timeouts
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
Saturday, 15 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
Friday, 14 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- [w3c/webauthn] 323789: minor editorial fixes
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
Wednesday, 12 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688)
- Event Invitation: WebAuthn WG
- [w3c/webauthn] 0bb9aa: authnr extension rather than client extension
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn] b8ec5b: polish Authenticator extension processing
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- 01/12/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting
- [webauthn] should reference "attestation statement format" registry instead of "extensions" registry (#1689)
Tuesday, 11 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- [w3c/webauthn] e23c4b: polish emlun's suggestion to not be a Note
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- [w3c/webauthn] d52342: Apply emlun's suggestions, thx!
- [webauthn] new commits pushed by equalsJeffH
- Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687)
- Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687)
- Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683)
- Weekly github digest (WebAuthn)
- Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687)
- Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640)
- Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640)
Monday, 10 January 2022
- Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687)
- Re: [webauthn] Incorrect "to create" phrase used in get() section's introduction? (#1687)
- Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688)
- Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688)
- Re: [webauthn] Syncing Platform Keys, Recoverability and Security levels (#1640)
- Re: [webauthn] Cross origin authentication without iframes (accommodating SPC in WebAuthn) (#1667)
- Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688)